Dr. A. S. Insenga

Office: 315 Pafford

Office number: 9-4864

Office hours: M, 10-12, 7-8 p.m. and W 10-12, 7-9

and by appointment

Website: westga.edu/~ainsenga

Writing Center hours:  TBA

Email: ainsenga@westga.edu

 

ENGL 2300—Practical Criticism: Research and Methodology

"Criticism is a misconception: we must read not to understand others but to understand ourselves.”

--Emile Cioran

 

Never trust the artist. Trust the tale. The proper function of the critic is to save the tale from the artist who created it."

--D.H. Lawrence

 

Course Description

This course serves as an introduction to representative critical approaches in literary studies, with particular attention to research and methodology. The class is required for the major in English as a prerequisite to upper-division study.  Prerequisites: ENGL 1101, ENGL 1102, and permission of the department Chair.

 

Course Objectives

·        Students will cultivate skills in reading, writing, and critical analysis appropriate for the advanced English major.

·        Students will understand major critical approaches that are employed in the field of literary studies.

·        Students will be able to read, discuss, and analyze literary works using a variety of critical perspectives.

·        Students will articulate how these perspectives both inform and direct our understanding and appreciation of literature.

·        Students will develop competence in literary analysis from at least three different critical perspectives.

·        Students will organize and complete a substantive research paper that demonstrates the ability to engage effectively in critical research and writing.

·        Students will demonstrate in both oral and written work a discipline-specific critical facility through convincing and well-supported analysis of course-related material.

·        Students will demonstrate their command of academic English and of the tenets of sound composition by means of thesis-driven, analytical prose.

 

THE WORK AHEAD

Required Texts

Aronofsky, Darren.  Requiem for a Dream (DVD).

Bressler, Charles. Literary Criticism:  An Introduction to Theory and Practice.

Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers.  6th ed.

Plath, Sylvia.  The Bell Jar.

Various supplemental readings provided to you (nothing to buy)

 

Highly Suggested Texts

Abrams, M.H.  A Glossary of Literary Terms. 8th ed. 

OR

Holman, C. Hugh. A Handbook to Literature. 3rd edition.

 

Major Assignments/Percentage Breakdown 

·        Four, two-page Reading Responses (15%)

·        Take home mid-term and final examination (15% each)

·        Major Research/Analytical essay (25%)

·        Group presentation for a classroom casebook, either on The Bell Jar or Requiem for a Dream, using a particular critical school for interpretation (10%)

·        Participation (10%)

·        Quizzes (10%)

 

Detailed Description of Major Assignments

Reading Responses:  each of these MLA documented, argument-driven, short essays will require you to demonstrate understanding of a critical school of thought as it is applied to a particular supplemental text. 

 

Take-home mid-term and final exam:  both exams will be essay exams, and both will ask you to define terms, articulate understanding of the five schools of thought on which we focus most of our attention, and apply one of them to a supplemental text.

 

Major Research/Analytical Essay:  This 8-10 page essay assignment requires you to use secondary sources and your own ideas to analyze a particular text of your choice using one or two theoretical lenses.  At mid-term, you will turn in a brief proposal that delineates three imperative elements about your project:  the text on which you will write (this could be a text you are reading for another class or have studied before or even a new text you want to analyze), a general argument you’d like to present about the text you’ve chosen, and a working bibliography of sources.  The proposal, like all work you submit, should be MLA-documented and at least three pages long.  If you struggle to find an appropriate text, come see me and we can chat about your interests.

 

Group Presentation:   close to the beginning of the semester, you will sign up to present on either Plath’s or Aronofsky’s text.  Your group will examine the text through a particular critical lens.  For example, you may apply feminism to The Bell Jar or elements of Marxism to Requiem. 

 

Participation:   because such a large portion of the course is devoted to discussion, entering into dialogue in the classroom is a must.  But participation isn’t just about talking in class; it includes bringing required materials, actively engaging with the material in your writing, and working well in small groups. 

 

Quizzes:  at least once a week, we’ll have a short quiz on the materials you read.  Quizzes will be conducted at either the beginning or end of class.  You cannot make up missed quizzes due to tardiness or absence. 

 

Major Classroom Procedures

Class periods roughly divide into two categories:  discussion days and skills days.  On discussion days, we will dialogue about assigned texts, either Bressler or one of the literary texts (the “what’s”). On skills days, our focus turns to writing about literature, and our topics for these class periods will include work on formulating claims, documentation, paragraphing, integrating source material, and, most of all, completing critical analysis (the “how’s”).

 

THE CONTEXT OF THE WORK AHEAD (COURSE POLICIES)

Attendance

As aforementioned, our course is discussion-based and activity-driven.  You must be present to reap the full benefit of said discussions. You are allotted four absences over the course of the semester.  I usually do not differentiate between excused and unexcused absences, and you need not tell me when/if you will be absent from class.  Upon your fifth absence, you will no longer be able to pass the course. Three tardies equal one absence, and you are tardy if you arrive after I have closed the door.

 

Late Work/Make-Up Work

As a general rule, I do not accept late work without penalty. Reading Responses turned in after the class period in which they are due are considered late, and I will take off one letter grade from the response’s final grade per weekday until the work is turned in to me. Your mid-term and final exams are take-home tests for which you will have ample time, and they will not be accepted late. Because you have the entire semester to work on your major project, I will not accept these assignments late under any circumstance. 

 

NOTE:  I realize that, occasionally, “life happens,” and that problems beyond your control can crop up once in a while.  Never hesitate to discuss problems/issues with me if you feel that your circumstance is dire.  With honest and swift communication, many issues can be resolved to your advantage.

 

Special Needs

Any student who has a special need should inform me during the first week of class.  We will then set up a conference to discuss the specifics of the official paperwork you have from the appropriate department. 

 

Plagiarism and Collusion 

From the English Department’s website:  “The Department of English and Philosophy defines plagiarism as taking personal credit for the words and ideas of others as they are presented in electronic, print, and verbal sources.” The Department expects that students will accurately credit sources in all assignments. An equally dishonest practice is fabricating sources or facts; it is another form of misrepresenting the truth. Plagiarism is grounds for failing the assignment and/or course.  You can also be subject to a university disciplinary review, and the university requires professors to report plagiarism in writing to the appropriate university office. Other university policies for handling cheaters are found here: The Faculty Handbook http://www.westga.edu/~vpaa/handrev/  and Student Uncatalogue: "Rights and Responsibilities" http://www.westga.edu/handbook/

 

Please note:  “excessive collaboration” includes having family members, friends, or significant others edit your work.  This means that no one should “fix” your grammar for you or “write in” sentences/sources/documentation for you.  This sort of behavior is cheating and will be treated as such.  We will collaborate in class, and you have the Writing Center as well as my input should you need extra advice about your writing.  Should you hire a personal tutor or use an athletic tutor, realize that excessive collaboration with that person can also result in plagiarism charges.  In short: do your own work. Should you cheat in this class, it is an automatic “F” for the course, and I will recommend that you be sent before a disciplinary committee.  My policy is a zero tolerance one. 

 

My Website/Paperless Policy

Many of your professors in the past may have used WEBCT for getting information to you.  However, I use only my website (westga.edu/~ainsenga).  All information for this course—this document, your daily syllabus, assignment sheets, handouts, announcements, resources, etc.—are hyperlinked on my website.  Please check the site regularly for updates. You will be responsible for printing out all documents from my website to bring to class. 

 

My UWG Policy:

As of fall 2006, all e-mail correspondence between professors and students must occur via university e-mail.  Please send all questions/ideas/concerns to me via you’re My UWG account.  I cannot answer to any other e-mail address.

 

Departmental Rubric

All ENGL courses numbered 2000 and above use a departmental rubric for grading. Please make yourself familiar with this rubric, as it is the way I will assess your work in our course.  The rubric is linked on your class’s resource page.  Feel free to address any specific questions about it to me.

 

Administrivia

·        I reserve the right to amend this document with further handouts.

·        Aside from office hours, the absolute best way to contact me is through e-mail. 

·        Please turn off cell phones and/or pagers when you enter our classroom.

·        Please remove I-pod ear buds and turn off I-pods when you enter our classroom.

·        Not coming to class prepared with textbooks and necessary materials is an automatic absence.  No exceptions.

·        All work must be presented in hard copy form.  I will accept no work through e-mail or on a diskette.  Problems with printers, computers, etc. will not necessitate any concessions on my part.

 

Detailed Syllabus (through mid-term)

January 8

Course Introduction

For next class:

Buy all texts

Print out syllabus from my website

Read Bressler, introduction and chapter one

Consider course contract found on your class’s resource page

Review course rubric found on your class’s resource page.

 

January 10

Packing Our Bag for the Journey:  Literary Theory, Literary Criticism

For next class:

Read Bressler, chapter two

Read Gibaldi, chapters 2 and 4

 

January 15

Holiday: no regular class or office hours

 

January 17

Course Contracts due

Historical Context(s): Mapping the Critical Terrain

For next class:

Read Bressler, chapter three, pgs. 50-67

Read Gibaldi, chapter five, pgs. 142-147, and chapter six, pgs. 238

and 239.

 

January 22

The First Lens:  New Criticism

For next class: 

Read Bressler, chapter three, pgs. 67-71

Read Gibaldi, chapter one, the sections on note-taking

 

January 24

Skills:  MLA and annotation

For next class:

Read and annotate Sylvia Plath’s poem “Daddy,” found

on your class’s resource page on my website

 

January 29

Applying New Criticism to Plath

Skills:  staking a claim

For next class:

Read Gibaldi, chapter three

Begin work on your first Reading Response

 

January 31

Applying New Criticism to Plath

For next class:

Reading Response One on Plath and New Criticism due (you

may consider crafting an argument for this response by using

one or more of the “Questions for Analysis” on pg. 65 of

Bressler)

 

February 5

Turn in Reading Response One

Skills:  paragraphing and incorporating evidence successfully

For next class:

Read Bressler, chapter four, pgs. 72-91

 

February 7

The Second Lens:  Reader-Oriented Criticism

For next class:

Read Bressler, chapter four, pgs. 91-95

 

February 12

Reader-Oriented Criticism

For next class:

Read Gibaldi, chapter one

 

February 14

Skills:  mounting a research project

For next class:

Read and annotate “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest

Hemingway found on your class’s resource page

 

February 19

Sign up for mandatory Major Project Proposal conferences

Applying Reader-Oriented Criticism (and perhaps New Criticism)

to Hemingway

For next class:

Reading Response Two due (you may choose to use the questions

for analysis on pg. 89 of Bressler as you formulate an argument)

 

February 21

Finish signing up for mandatory Major Project Proposal conferences

Take-home mid-term assigned (check your class’s resource page

at my website for the test)

Turn in Reading Response Two

Skills: discussion of Major Project Proposals and the research/

inquiry process

For next class:

No regular class.  Come to your mandatory conference to discuss

your Major Project and Proposal

 

February 26

No regular class—come see me in conference to discuss your Major Project and

Proposal

For next class:

Mid-term exam and Major Project Proposals due

 

February 28

Proposals and Mid-Term exams due

For next class:

Read Bressler, chapter six, pgs. 142-162

 

March 1:  mid-term

Last day to withdraw

 

More detailed syllabus to come. . .