TR
Breaking
the Code: Young Adult Literature,
Adolescents, and English Education
“It’s
Nathaniel Hawthorne Month in English.
Poor Nathaniel. Does he know what
they’ve done to him? We are reading The
Scarlet Letter one sentence at a time, tearing it up and chewing on its
bones. It’s all about SYMBOLISM. [. . .]
Every word chosen by Nathaniel, every comma, every paragraph break—these were
all done on purpose. To get a decent
grade in her class, we have to figure out what he was really trying to
say. Why couldn’t he just say what he
meant? Would they pin scarlet letters on
his chest? B for blunt, S
for straightforward? I can’t whine too much.
Some of it is fun. It’s like a
code, breaking into his head and finding the key to his secrets.”
Speak,
Laurie Halse Anderson
CONTACT
Dr. A. Insenga
Office number: TLC
2245
Office hours: TR
3-5, W 4-5:15 and by scheduled appointment
Office phone:
678-839-4864
Website: http://www.westga.edu/~ainsenga/
E-mail: ainsenga@westga.edu
THE
COURSE
How the Course
Fits into the English Education Program:
Young Adult Literature
is required for the English Education major and for certification in Secondary
Education; other English majors may also take the class to satisfy the Genre
and Theory 1 or 2 (English Major Area B1 or B2) requirements.
Course
Description:
What
books will I teach? How will I teach them? Can I teach film? Is that
book actually taught in high school? What if they ask me about racial slurs in
classic texts? Is it all right to talk religion? Can I teach a book with
cursing in it? Is that “appropriate”? What about parents? What will they
think? Questions like these regularly ricochet off walls of pedagogy-centered
classrooms in which students, who are themselves constant readers, begin to
concern themselves with ways that they might teach others to read constantly.
In an era when performance standards and the rigors of our own discipline can
create polarized discussions, we owe it to our teaching selves to enter the
professional conversation and find good answers to these and many other
questions.
During fall semester,
Young Adult literature students will begin their work by studying adolescent
psychological and cognitive development. We will then read primary texts, not
only demonstrating our collegiate analytical prowess but also discussing ways
to teach each text to secondary students. We will explore texts expressly
written for teenagers alongside canonical texts and study the sometimes
contentious battle between the “canon as cultural medicine” contingency and the
“lifelong learner” camp. We will talk about curricular planning and examine
Language Arts standards for secondary students, and undoubtedly we will draw
(and cross) boundary lines when it comes to philosophies regarding reading and
writing practices in public high schools.
Course
Objectives:
THE
WORK
Required texts:
*The department owns
three copies of this film. You may check out a copy for forty-eight hour
periods by coming seeing me in my office and signing out the film during office
hours. The film is also readily available for rental in
Major
Assignments:
**Initial
Certification students enrolled in the class will complete a 12-15
page project and use 5 sources for the Annotated Bibliography.
Description of
the Major Assignments Listed Above:
Daily Driving
Questions/Learning Lessons
Beginning August 20th,
students must complete daily assignments, of which there are two types. The first type, called Daily Driving
Questions, requires that for each class students craft two complex
questions related to our assigned primary or secondary readings. Each question
should not induce discussion of pure plot or rely on summary of our readings
but should, instead, drive us towards some sort of analytical discussion. Appropriate
questions could lead us to analyze a character or theme in a new way (e.g. “How
is M.T. Anderson’s use of the corporate sign for ‘trademark’ a critique of our
culture?” or “Are Bella’s actions with Edward damaging to the scores of adolescent
girls who read Meyer’s novel? Why or why
not?”). Other questions could relate to
our secondary materials (e.g. “Why is teaching classics of the utmost
importance for a ‘proper’ education?” or “Should we save the classics for
college, or should we introduce them during high school? Why and how? ”). You might also ask
questions that would lead us to discuss ways to teach close reading skills or
literary elements like metaphor, symbolism, allegory, etc.
The very best Daily
Driving Questions will reflect close reading and complex thinking about primary
and secondary materials and will not simply restate or rehash ideas but ask us
to flesh out and expand upon them—even to refute them. You should, of course,
be prepared to provide answers to your own and to others’ questions during
class discussion. I will collect the questions at the end of each
class period, and I can accept no late questions. Students can
expect to engage in this daily assignment most often.
The second type of
daily assignment, called Learning Lessons, will be completed four times
over the course of the semester. For each of these assignments, each of
you will create a single day’s Lesson Plan that covers an assigned primary text
and references specific ELA standards for a specific type of student, bring
this plan to class, and discuss your rationale and possible implementation with
the class. Each Learning Lessons assignment has specific goals, so
checking the syllabus assignment for each is imperative. Like Daily Driving
Questions, Learning Lessons assignments will be collected at the end of the
period in which they are due, and no late work will be accepted.
Analytical
You will complete two
pages of journal writing per week, save for the first week of classes and the
week of Fall Break. The Reading Journal
will contain 26 pages in all and will be due on November 24th, though I
may ask you to reference the entries as we discuss and may choose to collect
specific weeks’ entries periodically, so regularly bringing entries to class is
important.
Analytical Reading
Journal entries may be reflective in tone (intellectual reactions to class
discussion about the readings, close reading of the texts themselves, clear
discussion about the issues surrounding the teaching of YALit texts, etc.) or
argumentative, as many of you will want to work on articulating pedagogical
positions for the teaching of YALit and on positing interpretations of the primary
or secondary materials. Whatever tone or
content you choose, at least two full pages per week is the minimum
requirement, and I must see an analytical mind at work when I evaluate and
comment upon your entries. Reading
Journals should be word-processed and follow MLA Required Format and
documentation. Standard English, development, and organization are also a must.
Take-Home
Mid-term Examination
About a week or so
before mid-term, the Take-Home Mid-term Examination assignment will be posted
on the Class Resource Page. This essay exam will require you to synthesize
both theoretical and practical concepts we’ve studied in analytical,
argumentative, documented essays. MLA format and Standard English will
apply. See the detailed syllabus below
for assignment and due dates.
Final Scholarly
Project, Proposal, and Mandatory Peer Review
The Final Scholarly Project
is a tripartite one that requires you to choose a YALit text—one we have not
studied together—and to perform a critical, scholarly reading of it in Part
One. In Part Two of the project, you will offer up a clear
argument for teaching the text that outlines its pedagogical import in a
specific classroom setting. In Part Three, you’ll create at least
two daily Lesson Plans that incorporate your reading and your pedagogical
position. Essentially, then, in the same project you will theorize about
the text, argue for its implementation in a specific learning environment, and
put forth a detailed plan of action.
During the eleventh
week of the semester, you will turn in a two to three page Project Proposal
that introduces your text and reason for choosing it, outlines a general plan
of action for each of the three parts, and offers up a preliminary Works Cited
that evidences scholarly research. While your general plan and source list may well
change after you turn in the proposal, you cannot change your text.
Towards the end of the
semester, you will complete a draft, bring it to class, and participate in Peer
Review. Planning, drafting, and responding well to a peer’s work all
count towards the Final Project’s grade, so make sure that you examine Project
Proposal and draft due dates on the daily syllabus below.
Annotated
Bibliography
Along with your final
project, you will complete an annotated bibliography of at least three
of the sources you utilize. This exercise helps you to assess a source’s
value and to enter into the scholarly conversation. If you have never
completed an annotated bibliography, examine this annotated
bibliography link from Purdue’s OWL for guidelines, suggestions, and
models. We will also examine samples in
class towards the end of the semester.
THE
POLICIES
Grading Scale:
All English courses
2000-level and above use a departmental grading scale. Please familiarize
yourself with it, as it is the scale I will use to grade all Major Assignments.
To view this rubric, please click on the link entitled “Grading Rubric (upper
division)” on the main page of the English
Department’s Website.
Website/Paperless
Policy:
Many of your past professors
may have used WEBCT for getting information to you. However, I use only
my website (www.westga.edu/~ainsenga
). All information for this course—this document, exams, handouts,
announcements, resources, etc.—are hyperlinked on the website. Please
check the site regularly for updates, especially on days when you have new
assignments coming your way. You are also responsible for printing out
all documents from my website or those e-mailed to you.
“My UWG” and
Professionalism Policy:
As of fall 2006, all
e-mail correspondence between professors and students must occur via university
e-mail. Please send all communication to me via your “My UWG” account.
Further, all students
should assume a professional disposition when e-mailing or communicating about
or in class and/or when speaking to cooperating teachers, Observers, guest
speakers, and/or professor about Observation Events, scheduling, and English
Education.
Students should check
university e-mail daily to avoid missing important class or programmatic
messages. Checking university e-mail
regularly also prevents mailboxes from filling up. If university mailboxes fill up, messages do
not get queued; rather, they do not get delivered at all. Therefore, students risk not receiving
important information if they do not check e-mail in a timely fashion. E-mailing is an essential part of
effective and professional communication for this class, for the English
Education program, for the university at large, and for the teaching profession
you seek to enter.
You may refer to the Teacher
Education, Field Experiences, and Internship:
Policies and Procedure Handbook, the Code of Ethics for
Educators pamphlet, or The Conceptual Framework for more information
related to developing and maintaining a professional disposition.
Departmental
Attendance and Disruptive Student Policies***:
Students will be
administratively withdrawn from class based on the following attendance
policy: for classes that meet three times a week, a student is allowed four
absences. Upon the fifth absence, the student will be administratively
withdrawn. For classes that meet twice a week, a student is allowed three
absences. Upon the fourth absence, the student will be
administratively withdrawn. Be aware that no distinction exists
between excused and unexcused absences. You need not inform me of any absence.
Students will be
dismissed from any class meeting in which they exhibit behavior that disrupts
the learning environment of others. Such behavior includes—but is not
limited to—repeatedly arriving late for class, allowing cell phones to ring,
speaking disrespectfully to the instructor and/or to other students, checking
email or surfing the web, and using personal audio or video devices. Each
dismissal of this kind will count as an absence and will be applied toward the
attendance requirements policy above.
Late Work/Make-Up
Work:
You may not make up
missed Daily Driving Questions or Learning Lessons assignments. Late
Reading Journals and Mid-Term Examinations will not be accepted except under
the direst of circumstances. If you feel you have such a
circumstance, you must see me in conference to discuss your problem. At that
time, I will determine whether or not an assignment can be turned in late and
what deduction will be applied. ***
***I realize that,
occasionally, “life happens” and that some problems beyond your control crop up
once in a while. Never hesitate to discuss problems with assignments or
attendance with me if you feel that your circumstance is dire. With
honest and swift communication, many issues can be resolved to your advantage.
Required
Format:
Each Major Assignment must
be word-processed and in MLA format. If you need a refresher on MLA
format, see this MLA
Documentation link from the OWL at Purdue. Also, be advised that
students must turn in hard copies of work—not electronic copies.
Students with
Special Needs:
Any student who has a
special need should inform me during the first week of class. We will
then set up a conference to discuss the specifics of the official paperwork you
have from the appropriate department.
Plagiarism,
Collusion, and Academic Dishonesty Policy:
From the English
Department’s website: “The Department of English and Philosophy defines
plagiarism as taking personal credit for the words and ideas of others as they
are presented in electronic, print, and verbal sources.” The Department expects
that students will accurately credit sources in all assignments. An equally
dishonest practice is fabricating sources or facts; it is another form of
misrepresenting the truth. Plagiarism is grounds for failing the assignment
and/or course. You can also be subject to a university disciplinary
review, and the university requires professors to report plagiarism in writing
to the appropriate university office. Other university policies for handling
cheaters are found here: The
Faculty Handbook and UWG Connection and Student
Handbook.
Please note:
“excessive collaboration” includes having family members, friends, or
significant others edit your work. This means that no one should “fix”
your grammar for you or “write in” sentences/sources/documentation for
you. This sort of behavior is cheating and will be treated as such.
We will collaborate in class, and you have the
In short: do your own
work. Should you cheat in this class, it is an automatic “F” for the course,
and I will recommend that you be sent before a disciplinary committee. My
policy is a zero tolerance one.
Administrivia:
THE
SYLLABUS
WEEK ONE (no Reading
Journal entries this week)
Course
Introduction: Policies, Procedures, Expectations, and Responsibilities
WEEK TWO
Discuss Bushman and
Haas
Discuss The
Conceptual Framework and Code of Ethics for Educators
Discuss Bushman and
Haas
WEEK THREE
Discuss Scorpions
Discuss Scorpions
Discuss Appleman
WEEK FOUR
Discuss A Raisin in
the Sun
Discuss Bushman and
Haas
Discuss A Raisin in
the Sun
Discuss Appleman
Discuss Bushman and
Haas
WEEK
Learning Lessons One
Workshop
Discuss 1984
Discuss Bushman and
Haas
WEEK SIX
Discuss 1984
Discuss Bushman and
Haas
Discuss 1984
WEEK SEVEN
Mid-term Examination
Assigned (see Class Resource Page)
Discuss Feed
Discuss Feed
WEEK EIGHT
Turn in the Mid-Term
Examination at the beginning of class
Discuss 1984
and Feed
Learning Lessons Two
Workshop
WEEK NINE
Discuss Children of
Heaven
Discuss Teasley and
Wilder
Discuss Children of
Heaven
Discuss Bushman and
Haas
WEEK TEN (no Reading Journal
entries this week)
Discuss
You Hear Me?: Poems and Writing by Teenage Boys
WEEK ELEVEN
Discuss You Hear
Me?: Poems and Writing by Teenage Boys
Discuss Tsujimoto’s essay
Turn in the Proposal
for the Final Project
Discuss You Hear
Me?: Poems and Writing by Teenage Boys
Discuss Bushman and
Haas
WEEK TWELVE
Learning Lessons Three
Workshop
Discuss Speak
WEEK THIRTEEN
Discuss Speak
Discuss Appleman
Discuss Speak
WEEK FOURTEEN
“Meyer Mania”: The Rise of the Young Adult Serial Novel
Discuss Twilight
WEEK FIFTEEN
Discuss Twilight
Discuss Bushman and
Haas
Discuss the Final
Project, if necessary
Discuss Twilight
Discuss the Annotated
Bibliography and other aspects of the Final Project, if necessary
WEEK SIXTEEN (no
Reading Journal entries this week)
Turn in your complete Reading
Journal
Learning Lessons Four
Workshop
WEEK SEVENTEEN (no
Reading Journal entries this week)
Course Evaluations
Guided Peer Review
Workshop