Panel Presentations: Film Analysis—To Kill A Mockingbird
Director(s): Robert Mulligan
Actors: Gregory Peck, John Megna, Frank Overton, Rosemary Murphy, Ruth White
Rating: N/R
Studio: Universal Studios
Guidelines: Groups, consisting of three to four individuals, will present an informed discussion of a pre-assigned scene(s) from the film, TKM. Each group is expected to explicate the scene(s) in close detail, with particular attention to the various techniques, Mulligan, the director, draws upon to relay the film’s underlying arguments, themes, ideas and messages. You will be given time in class to begin studying your film clip, meet and collaborate with your group members, and work toward packaging your presentation for class. However, this presentation may require additional time and group collaboration outside of class. I recommend that each member of the group exchange phone numbers and/or email addresses.
Formal Requirements: Each presentation will range (approximately) 20 minutes. Each group should address the following requirements, with every individual participating actively.
Oral Presentation
1) Show your film clip to the class (each clip will take no more than a few minutes)
2) Annotate & analyze (exhaustively) the sequence:
a. You can do this one of two ways: walk the class through an image-by-image replay of the scene, explicating it as you go; or, you can show the scene in its entirety and then explicate the images afterwards. Sometimes, however, it’s more effective for your audience to connect your discussion to the text visually; hence, you might freeze frame the screen in order to single out, highlight and discuss the visual composition of a particular image before moving on to the next image.
b. Move beyond plot observations. We already know “what happens” in the scene. It is your task to offer interpretations of the scene’s key themes and underlying themes and ideas. You need to address such questions as: How is meaning constructed? Why does the director utilize various techniques (to what effect—to reinforce a theme, to convey the internal world of the character, etc?)?
c. Focus your annotations and analysis on the components of film discussed below: character, themes, and technical elements like lighting, sound, mise-en-scene, editing, shots, etc.
3) For effectiveness, take turns annotating and analyzing aspects of the sequence. Each person should carry an equal part of this discussion.
4) Conclusion: Present a working “thesis” for this scene—the guiding lens that shapes: (a) how you interpret the meaning and message of this particular scene and (b) its significance to the film at large. You must justify how and why you came to this conclusion. For example, make a case about how the technical elements reinforce an argument, theme, or main idea in the film. How does this scene provide a “window” within which to view the film’s main ideas? How does this scene comment upon the film at large: its themes, conflicts, characters, etc.?
5) Visual Representation/Presentation: power-point presentation, handout, dialogue excerpts, and/or any visual representation from your scene(s) that contains explanatory notes which helps your group effectively annotate/explain your group's chosen scene(s)
|
Tips in analyzing your scene: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Film for Study and Analysis
Films share many of the same elements as other forms of literature (theme, character, setting, point of view, metaphors, symbols, foreshadowing techniques), but it also has elements specific to the genre (mise-en-scene, shots)
Point of view is the central term in writing about films because films are basically about seeing the world in a certain way. Pay attention to point of view by using these two general guidelines:
Observe how and
when the camera creates the point of view of a character—and to what effect.
Notice if the
story is told mostly from an objective point of view or from the subjective
perspective of one person.
i. Do the objects and props in the setting, whether natural ones (like rivers and trees) or artificial ones (like paintings, posters, and buildings) have a special significance that relates to the characters, theme, and story?
ii. Does the arrangement of objects, props, and characters within that setting have some significance? (for example, are they crowded together? Do inanimate objects seem to have a life?)
iii. What does the lighting suggest about the tone or mood of a scene, even about the psychological mindsets of characters?
i. Long shot or establishing shot: Showing the main object at a considerable distance from the camera and thus presenting it in relation to its general surroundings
ii. Medium shot: the camera records and area equal to the height or a seated figure or a figure from the waist up.
iii. Close-up shot: an image in which the distance between the subject and the point of view is very short, as in a close-up of a person’s face. It is considered the director’s chief way of directing our vision and of emphasizing a detail.
i. Pan shot: The camera is mounted on a non-moving base and films while pivoting on its axis along the line of the horizon from left to right to right to left.
ii. Tilt shot: The camera can move up or down while fixed on its axis.
iii. Traveling shot (dolly shot): The camera can move forward or backward while fixed on its axis.
iv. Crane shot: The camera can move in and out an dup and down while mounted on a mechanical crane.
v. High angle shot: The camera is placed higher than the subject, often suggesting a God’s-eye view of helpless and vulnerable people.
vi. Low angle shot: The camera is placed lower than the subject. It often produces a towering figure or object.
i. Intercut: Within a sequence may be an intercut, a switch to another action that, for example, provides an ironic comment on the main action of the sequence.
ii. Parallel editing: Occurs when intercuts are so abundant in a sequence that two or more sequences are going on at once.
i. Straight cut: transitional device in which a strip of film is spliced to another, resulting in an instantaneous transfer from one shot to the next. The most common form of transition.
ii. Double cutting: Splicing the same image multiple times.
iii. Dissolve: Old transitional device in which a shot dissolves while a new shot appears to emerge beneath it. As a result, there is a moment when we get a superimposition of both scenes.
iv. Fade: Old transitional device.
1. Fade-out: the screen grows darker until black.
2. Fade-in: the screen grows lighter until the new screen is fully visible.
v. Wipe: Older transitional device found in many old films and some modern films that seek an archaic effect. The wipe acts as a sort of windshield wiper that wipes off the first scene, revealing the next.
vi. Iris: Older transitional device also found in older films.
1. Iris-in: The new scene first appears in the center of the previous scene and then this circle expands until it fills the screen.
2. Iris-out: Shows the new scene first appearing along the perimeter and then the circle closes in on the previous scene.
i. Montage: (the French word for editing). According to Barnett, a montage has different meanings for Russian, French, and American filmmakers. In Hollywood it refers to any sequence of rapidly edited images that suggests the passage of time or events. It sketches but does not develop information about characters.
ii. Continuity editing or invisible editing: most of us pay little attention to editing because we enjoy most the continuity editing of classical cinema. This editing style is appropriately called invisible because the filmmaker, not wanting to distract from the story, avoids cuts and distractions between images that would be too obvious.
i. When a filmmaker uses continuity editing, are there implications concerning the world and society in the “continuity”? Is the film trying to create a sense of a logical and safe world? Do long (establishing) shots, for instance, indicate that the characters (and audience) know where they are and should feel at home?
ii. In films that break away from continuity editing, why are there so few long (establishing) shots in them? Is it difficult to say where an action takes place because the scene begins with a close-up of a character or inside an unidentified room? Do the characters seem to share our disorientation? Is the disorientation related to the themes of the film?
iii. Is there a point of view we can identify with? Does the filmmaker force his audience to remain detached from the ordinary people and to identify instead with something or someone else? Does the film contain images that seem to have no place in the story? A film about a war may cut to an image of a cherry tree time and time again. Is it a symbol? Is it part of the character’s memory? Why is the continuity of the action broken by this unexplained image?
|
Signifier (shot) |
Definition |
Signified |
|
close-up |
face only |
intimacy |
|
medium shot |
most of the body |
personal relationship |
|
long shot |
setting & characters |
context, scope, public distance, character in relation to surroundings |
|
full shot |
full body of person |
social relationship |
|
pan down |
camera looks down |
power, authority |
|
pan up |
camera looks up |
smallness, weakness, vulnerability |
|
zoom in |
camera moves in |
observation, focus |
|
fade in |
image appears on blank screen |
beginning |
|
fade out |
image screen goes blank |
ending |
|
cut |
switch from one image to another |
simultaneity, excitement |
|
wipe |
image wiped off screen |
imposed |
Presentations and Assigned Material
TBA