MEDT 6467 TECHNOLOGY FOR MEDIA SERVICES
3 Semester Hours
Spring 2001
Instructor: Dr.
Elizabeth Kirby Bennett
Office Location: 150
Education Annex
Office Hours: Mon.
7:00 - 8:00 pm (Newnan or online);
Tues. 1:00
- 4:00 pm (office), 7:00 - 8:00 pm (office or online)
Weds.
10:00 - Noon (office), 2:00 - 5:00 pm (office)
Other
hours by appointment.
Telephone:
(770) 836-4438 (office); (770) 836-8941 (home)
E-mail: ebennett@westga.edu
Distance Support: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/webct3/main/help.html
http://webct.westga.edu:7900/webct/public/home.pl
http://www.westga.edu/~library/depts/offcampus/
http://www.westga.edu/~library/info/library.shtml
http://www.westga.edu/~distance/
Fax: (770) 838-3088
COURSE
DESCRIPTION
Prerequisite:
MEDT 2401 or equivalent
An introduction to technology for media services and library
automation including computer and video networking, internet, automation
technologies, and library applications software. This course is GSAMS 60% and
WebCT 40%.
CONCEPTUAL
FRAMEWORK
Through this course students will demonstrate progress in
the achievement of two NBPTS propositions that form the conceptual framework
for advanced preparation programs in the College of Education. This course will
enable the student to begin the development of a portfolio that could be
submitted for National Board certification.
Proposition
3. Educators are responsible for managing and monitoring student learning. Graduate
students will be able to manage learning resources to support optimal student
learning through creation and management of technology infrastructures such as
computer and video networks.
Proposition
5. Educators are members of learning communities. Graduate
students will be able to generate plans for personally staying abreast of
technology innovations and for sharing and infusing technology integration
strategies with other teachers, administrators, and parents.
COURSE
OBJECTIVES
Students
will:
1.
identify and evaluate networking applications for school and
media center use [Proposition 3] (Barron and Orwig, 1995; Bucher, 1994; Derfler
and Freed, 1996; Lowe, 1998; Meghabghab, 1997);
2.
identify and evaluate access methods, software applications
and acceptable use policies for
Internet
utilization in schools and media centers [Proposition 5] (Barron and Orwig,
1995; Eddings, 1994; Ryder and Hughes, 1997; Simpson, 1995);
3. describe the process involved in automating a
school library media center [Proposition 3] (Meghabghab, 1997; Murphy, 1992;
Winnebago, 1993; Wisconsin Dept. Public Instruction, 1991);
4. identify and evaluate the hardware and
software components of a library automation system [Proposition 3] (Meghabghab,
1997; Murphy, 1990; Murphy, 1992; Saffady, 1991; Winnebago, 1993; Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction, 1991);
5. define and explain the MARC standard
[Proposition 3] (Eppelheimer, 1993; Furrie, 1998; Meghabghab, 1997; Murphy,
1992; Piepenburg, 1999; Winnebago, 1993; Wisconsin Department of Public
Instruction, 1991);
6.
use an automation program to generate MARC catalog records
[Proposition 3] (Eppelheimer, 1993; Furrie, 1998; Meghabghab, 1997; Murphy,
1992; Piepenburg, 1999; Winnebago, 1993; Wisconsin Department of Public
Instruction, 1991); and
7.
identify sources of library automation products and services
[Proposition 3] (Meghabghab, 1997; Murphy,1992; Wisconsin Department of Public
Instruction, 1991).
8.
identify and develop strategies for training students,
faculty and others to use technology based resources [Proposition 5] (Barron
and Orwig, 1995; Meghabghab, 1997; Ryder and Hughes, 1997; Simpson, 1995)
TEXTS, READINGS, AND INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES
Required
Texts: Furrie, B. (1998). Understanding
MARC-bibliographic ( ed.). McHenry, IL: Follett Software Co.
Meghabghab,
D. B. (1997). Automating media centers and
small libraries.
Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
UWG
Distance Learning Success Guide (2001).
Additional
readings will come from technology-related periodicals and journals available
online through GALILEO.
References:
Automate your library.
(n.d.). Williamsport, PA: Brodart.
Barron, A. E. & Orwig, A. E.
(1995). New technologies for education: A beginner's guide (2nd ed.).
Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Bucher, K. T. (1994). Computers
& technology in school library media centers. Worthington, OH: Linworth
Publishing, Inc.
Derfler, F. J., Jr. & Freed, L.
(1996). How networks work (2nd ed.). Emeryville, CA: Ziff-Davis.
Eddings, J. (1994). How the
internet works. Emeryville, CA: Ziff-Davis.
Eppelheimer, L. (1993). MARC:
Making it manageable. Caledonia, MN: Winnebago Software.
Lowe, D. (1998). Networking for
dummies (3rd ed.). Foster City, CA: IDG.
Murphy, C. (1990). Online
catalogs in school library media centers: A planning guide. Chicago, IL:
ALA.
Murphy, C. (1992). Automating
school library catalogs: A reader. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Piepenburg, S. (1999). Easy MARC: A
Simplified Guide to Creating Catalog Records for Library Automation (3rd
ed.). Castle Rock, CO: F & W Assoc.
Ryder, R. J. & Hughes, T. (1997).
Internet for educators. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Saffady, W. (1991). Automating
the small library. Chicago, IL: ALA.
Simpson, C. M. (1995). Internet
for library media specialists. Worthington, OH: Linworth Publishing, Inc.
Winnebago Software. (1993). Guide
to library automation: A step by step introduction (2nd ed.). Caledonia,
MN: Winnebago Software.
Wisconsin Department of Public
Instruction (1991). Small library automation: Information and issues.
Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Current
educational media and technology magazines dealing with technology and school
media centers (School Library Journal, Electronic Learning, T.H.E. Journal,
Media and Methods, etc.)
ASSIGNMENTS, EVALUATION PROCEDURES, AND GRADING
POLICIES
Assignments:
Students
are expected to attend all class sessions, to be prepared for each class by
doing the assigned readings in advance, and to have the appropriate materials
required for class activities. If you have a valid reason for missing class,
please contact the instructor in advance so appropriate plans can be made for
you to obtain the information that was presented. More than one unexcused
absence will lower a student's cumulative course grade by 5 points per absence.
1. Technology
Information Presentation (Group project, supports Propositions 3, 5, and
Objectives 1, 3, 4, and 7 ). Each group will research and present a brief (30
minute) informational report on one of the topics listed below. Projects will
be graded based on content (information accuracy, comprehensiveness);
presentation effectiveness (creativity, organization, communication, visuals);
and written materials. Written materials will include
•a class handout containing information
relevant to the topic,
•a presentation content outline (submitted
to the instructor prior to the
presentation), and
•a summary of each group member's
contribution to the project.
Presentation Date & Topic
Feb 12: Computer
Network Security
Feb 26: Hardware
Peripherals for Automation Systems (I.e., bar code readers, wands, etc.)
March 12: Automated
Ordering & Acquisition (via CD-ROM, online, etc.)
April 2: a.
Patron Privacy Issues (& relationship to Automation Systems)
b. Satellite Systems
& Video distribution systems (Hardware)
e. GPTV, GSAMS, Virtual
High School services and resources for P-12 (Software)
2.
Technology Training Presentation (Group project, supports Proposition 5 and
Objectives 2, 3, 6, and 8). Each group will develop a training workshop and
materials for students, faculty, or media center staff covering some component
of an automation system, use of technology-based reference materials, or one
component of an automation system. Each project must include at least one job
aid (sign, brochure, etc.) that will help the target audience recall and do
what they have learned. The workshop plan and job aid should incorporate
standard instructional design principles (audience and content analysis, clear
objectives, appropriate instructional strategies, evaluation component). Each
group will be allotted 30 minutes to present their training plan and supporting
materials. Projects will be graded based on content (accuracy,
comprehensiveness, design); presentation effectiveness (creativity,
organization, communication, visuals); and written materials.
Written
materials will include
•a class handout summarizing the
project and materials,
•a complete project packet
(lesson/workshop plans, sample materials, job aids, and outline of class
presentation) for the instructor, and
•a summary of each group member's
contribution to the project.
Class
handouts (one for each student) should be distributed to each site prior to the
presentation according to the guidelines described for the technology
information presentation.
Suggested
Topics: OPAC searching for students or teachers, Using the OPAC to
check out materials for students or teachers, creating and modifying MARC
records for media aides, CD-ROM reference for students or teachers, Network
Access/Use for students or teachers, WWW for students or teachers.
3. Exams.
(Individual, supports Propositions 3 and 5 and Objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
and 8). Each student will complete two written exams, one at midterm and one at
the conclusion of the semester. The exams will consist of a variety of
questions to assess the student's ability to recall and apply a variety of
networking and automation technology information.
4.
Networking Project. (Individual and Group Components, supports Proposition 3
and Objective 1). Individually, each student will obtain or draw a network
diagram as it currently exists for a real school media center, and will
identify significant features of the network. Working in groups, students will
design and spec a network for a hypothetical media center.
5. Marc
Records. (Individual, supports Propositions 3 & 5). Each student will
create original MARC records for a print, video, and computer software
resource.
6. Internet
Filtering Debate. (Individual and Group, supports Proposition 5 and Objective
2). Individually, students will read articles related to the pros and cons of
internet filtering in media centers. In assigned groups, students will compile
a bibliography for the debate position assigned to their group and debate the
pros and cons of filtering with another group in a WebCT chat room. Following
the debate, students will individually write a one page position paper on the
issue.
7. Class
activities and participation. Students will be informally observed for
contributions to class discussion and participation in other class activities
(face to face and online). Students will be expected to log on for a minimum of
two sessions for each on-line class "meeting."
Evaluation
Procedures:
Students
will be evaluated in following areas:
1. Technology
Information Presentations............................ 10%
2.
Technology Training Presentation................................... 15%
3. Written
examinations...................................................... 40%
(First exam = 20% and Second exam =
20%)
4.
Networking Project....................................................... 15%
(Individual component = 10%, Group
component = 5%)
5. Marc
Records...............................................................
5%
6. Filtering
Debate............................................................. 10%
7. Class
activities & participation........................................
5%
All
assignments will be evaluated on the basis of accuracy, comprehensiveness,
creativity and presentation.
Grading
Policy:
The
grading standards below are used for all class projects and examinations:
A= 92-100%, B= 82-91%, C= 70-81%, and F= 69% and below.
TENTATIVE CLASS OUTLINE
Jan 8 (Newnan) Course overview, intro
to WebCT
Jan 15 MLK Holiday - No class, but work
on WebCT!
Jan 22 (WebCT) PCs & troubleshooting,
basic terms
Jan 29 (GSAMS) Computer networks:
architecture, cabling, protocols, operations
Feb 5 (GSAMS) Designing computer
networks
Feb 12 (GSAMS) Comparing networks, network
security, Exam 1 (on WebCT)
Feb 19 (WebCT) Planning for automation,
automation system overview
Feb 26 (GSAMS) Automation system
components: hardware & software
March 5 (WebCT) Using automation systems
March 12 (GSAMS) RFPs, Upgrading automation
systems
March 19 Spring Break!
March 26 (WebCT) Internet issues for media
specialists
April 2 (GSAMS) Technology issues for
media specialists, Staff Development, Part I
April 9 (GSAMS) Introduction to MARC
Bibliographic
April 16 (GSAMS) Creating MARC records
(Carver will have to come to Newnan)
April 23 (GSAMS) More MARC, Exam 2 (on WebCT)
April 30 (GSAMS) Teaching Students, Faculty
& Staff to Use Technology (Presentations I)
May 7 (GSAMS) Teaching Students, Faculty
& Staff to Use Technology (Presentations II)
WebCT
classes will be conducted using WebCT, http://webct.westga.edu
Internet
access will be required!!! Assigned readings for all classes and general class
information will also be posted on WebCT.
ACADEMIC HONESTY
Students
are expected to adhere to the highest standards of academic honesty. Plagiarism
occurs when a student uses or purchases ghost-written papers. It also occurs
when a student utilizes the ideas of or information obtained from another
person without giving credit to that person. If plagiarism or another act of
academic dishonesty occurs, it will be dealt with in accordance with the academic
misconduct policy as stated in The UnCatalog,Undergraduate Catalog
, and Graduate Catalog .
MED 832 Project Information Sheet
1. Technology Information Presentation (Group
project, Weight 10%)
Each group will research and present
a brief (15 minute) informational report on one of topics listed below.
Projects will be graded based on content (information accuracy,
comprehensiveness); presentation effectiveness (organization, communication);
and written materials. Written materials will include a class handout
containing information relevant to the topic (and appropriate for inclusion in
the Technology Handbook), a presentation content outline (submitted to the
instructor prior to the presentation), and a summary of each group member's
contribution to the project. Handouts (one per student) should be distributed
to each site prior to the presentation.
Presentation
Date & Topic
****January
22
a.
Monitoring & Internet filtering software, off-line Internet solutions (such
as Web Whacker)
b.
Internet Search Engines, basic Internet search techniques
****January
29
a. Video
distribution systems
b.
Satellite services and resources (GPTV etc.), GSAMS resources for P-12
****February
12
a.
Automation system peripherals
b. Media
center/public library cooperation (automation & technology related)
****February
19
a.
Automated/on-line ordering and acquisition
b.
Automation system overdue reporting capabilities, school survey of overdue
procedures
****February
26
a. Dial-in
and Internet access to OPACs
b.
Automated media and textbook management programs
2. Technology Training Development and Presentation (Group project: Weight 20%)
Each group will develop a training
workshop and materials for students, faculty, or media center staff covering
some aspect of Internet use, use of technology-based reference materials, or
one component of an automation system. Each project must include at least one
job aid (sign, brochure, etc.) that will help the target audience recall and do
what they have learned. The workshop plan and job aid should incorporate
standard instructional design principles (audience and content analysis, clear
objectives, appropriate instructional strategies, evaluation component). Each
group will be allotted 30 minutes to present their training plan and supporting
materials. Projects will be graded based on content (accuracy,
comprehensiveness, design); presentation effectiveness (organization,
communication); and written materials. Written materials will include a class
handout summarizing the project and materials (again, appropriate for the
Technology Handbook), a complete project packet and set of materials for the
instructor, and a summary of each group member's contribution to the project.
Class handouts (one for each student) should be distributed to each site prior
to the presentation.
Suggested
Topics: WWW for students or teachers, e-mail for students or
teachers, OPAC searching for students or teachers, Checking out materials for
students or teachers, CD-ROM reference for students or teachers, Network
Access/Use for students or teachers.
3. Media Center Technology Handbook (Individual
project: Weight 30%)
Each student will compile a media
center technology notebook. The notebook should include sections on computer
networks, video distribution systems and resources, Internet, automation
systems, and technology training. Other sections may be included as needed.
Class notes, materials, handouts, etc. should be incorporated into the handbook
as appropriate for future "ready reference." Other readings or
materials you collect independently during the quarter related to these topics
should also be added. The following must also be included in the appropriate
sections of the handbook:
1. A
diagram of your selected school's computer network, with components identified
and software licensing information described.
2. A list
of Internet Service Providers and fees for your area.
3.
Acceptable Use Policy criteria and sample AUPs.
4. An
in-depth evaluation of an OPAC. You select the system, review the manual, go
through the tutorial if one is available. Complete the OPAC evaluation form
which will be distributed in class and write a short, descriptive critique
indicating strengths and weaknesses of the system you selected. Pay attention
to the OPAC interface, and whether it is appropriate for the audience it is
being used with. In addition, investigate the kinds of displays, reports,
bibliographies, and statistics you can retrieve from the system, and include as
many different printouts as you can. Annotate the printouts (explaining
headers, abbreviations, or other information that may be unclear).
5. MARC
records for a book, a video, and a piece of computer software. These records
must be generated using Mitinet or through original cataloging on your
automation system.
The
notebooks will be graded for content, accuracy, comprehensiveness, and
organization. The OPAC evaluation will count 60% of the notebook grade, the
MARC records will count 20%, and the remaining components will count 20%.