Two Part Rubric for Contributions to Online Discussions
Possible Points |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Shows Understanding Through Explanation |
Sophisticated: an unusually thorough, elegant, and inventive account (model, theory, or explanation); fully supported, verified, and justified; deep and broad; goes well beyond the information given. It is very clear that readings were understood and incorporated well into responses |
In-depth: a revealing account, going beyond what is obvious or what was explicitly taught; makes subtle connections; well supported by argument and evidence; novel thinking displayed. It is clear that readings were understood and incorporated into responses |
Developed: an account that reflects some in-depth and personalized ideas; the student is making the work their own, going beyond the given -there is supported theory here, but insufficient or inadequate evidence and argument. You did not incorporate enough information from the assigned readings in your responses to the questions: What Happens to Students When Assessments are Well Done Versus When They are Poorly done. |
Intuitive: an incomplete account but with apt and insightful ideas; extends and deepens some of what was learned; some "reading between the lines"; account has limited support, argument, or data. Some sweeping generalizations are made that are not supported. There is a theory, but one with limited evidence or support from assigned readings. |
Naïve: a superficial account; more descriptive than analytical or creative; a fragmentary or sketchy account of facts/ideas or glib generalizations; a black-and-white account; less a theory than an unexamined hunch or borrowed idea. |
| Points received for Understanding Through Explanation…………… | |||||
The rubric above is drawn from the writings of Wiggens and McTighe on Assessment of Understandings via Explanation.Wiggens, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandra , VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Summary Table of Discussion Participation
Possible Points |
1 |
Points Awarded |
Timely discussion contributions |
Contributes to discussions in a timely way, so that others have the time to read and respond to postings. |
|
Responsiveness to discussion postings of other course participants. |
Posts thoughtful responses to other participants' comments. Feedback is constructive, specific and supportive, OR Feedback raised additional engaging discussion topics. |
|
Points received for Quality of Explanation……….. |
||
Total Points Awarded…….. |
||