Mr. McMahand
English Composition
Peer Edit Sheet for Poetry Analysis Essay
Introduction
1.
Does the writer
construct a clearly developed framework, relating both poems to the poets’
backgrounds? Should the writer relate
the poems to a social issue or reality?
Where and how should the writer expand his framing remarks?
2.
How could the
writer improve her introduction of
the authors and the poems’ titles?
3.
Examine the
thesis carefully. Has the writer
assembled a forceful, argumentative statement(s) that lends clarity and
dimension to the poems’ themes, structures, imagery, etc.? How might the writer improve the content and
the phrasing?
4.
Comment on the
strength (or weakness) of the connection between the two poems. Offer points of improvement.
Argument and Analysis
1. Does the writer offer a credible and
convincing explication of the poems, line by line, stanza by stanza?
2. Do the explications gesture back to the
thesis, or do some of these seem unnecessarily divergent or superfluous?
3. Where could the writer better improve her
analysis of the lines? Does she overlook
certain connotations in the language? Does she ignore provocative images, gloss
over powerful
metaphors?
4. How tight is the analysis? How repetitive? Are there noticeable gaps in the argument, in
its clarity, flow, logic, stability? In
other words, does the writer explain all of his ideas
clearly? Could the writer analyze more of the poems’
subtle tonal shifts and contradictions, the structural unity?
5. Does the writer make a convincing comparison
of the two poems? Does the comparison balance
the ideas, images, metaphors, etc. in both pieces?
6. Does the writer quote too often from the poems? Should the writer quote the poems more?
Conclusion
1. Suggest ways to improve restatements of
thesis and main ideas.
2. Offer points of improvement to the writer’s
transition from the body to the conclusion.
General Concerns
1. Does the writer remember to write consistently
in present tense, in active voice?
2. Does the writer introduce and cite all
quotations?
3. Suggest changes for awkward phrasing,
grammar, and mechanics (putting all punctuation inside quotation marks, for
example).
4. Point out places for improving transitions
within and between paragraphs.
5. Check the writer’s use of MLA in citing,
building a Works Cited page, creating a proper heading and title. Good titles
briefly comment on theme and include the title of the literary
work:
Ghostly Revelations in Stanley Kunitz’s “Quinnapoxet” and “Passing
Through”
Spiritual Doubt: Olds’s “Prayer in the
Time of Illness” and Kenyon’s “Let Evening Come”