ENGLISH
3200-01W INTERMEDIATE CREATIVE
WRITING: FICTION
Fall 2008
TR 12:30-1:45
TLC 1204
Dr. Randy Hendricks
TLC 2223
678-839-4876
rhendric@westga.edu
Office Hours
TR 11:00-12:15; 2:00-3:15
Also available by appointment.
Overview: Students in this course will improve their knowledge of and practice in the art of fiction first of all by writing and then by subjecting their writing to evaluation by the instructor and other members of the class. Students are also expected to learn to read as writers read--with an eye for the techniques and effects an artist brings to his or her work.
For course goals and relation of course to program, go to Course Guides and then click on ENGL 3200.
Text: Oates, Joyce Carol, Telling Stories:
An
Anthology for Writers
Requirements: a number of short writing assignments, one
full
fictional narrative carried through mulitple drafts, 3 formal critiques
of
narratives by other students in the class; two brief analytical papers,
and a
porfolio collecting all of these assignments in multiple
revisions
(80% of final grade), total participation (20% of final grade).
At
the end of the semester, we will construct a course anthology comprised
of your own original writing. The anthology, paid for by course fees,
is part
of a larger effort to establish creative writing as a vibrant campus
community.
If you enjoy this class, you might even think of the next step: a minor
in
creative writing. Established in 2004, the creative-writing minor
continues to
grow each year and is almost entirely responsible for the national
success of
our campus magazine, the Eclectic. Your course fees also help
to fund
UWG’s Reading Series, which brings national authors to campus each
semester for
readings of poetry, fiction, and creative nonfiction. Previous readers
include
Oprah Book Club author Wally Lamb, Pulitzer-prize winner Margaret
Edson,
PEN/Bernard Malamud Award winner Ann Beattie, Georgia Poet Laureate
David Bottoms,
Kingsley Tufts Award winner B. H.
Fairchild, and many others.
Some
Policies, Expectations, and Other Important Information
Expectations: The professional relationship between an instructor and a student is not that of vendor and consumer. One does not buy learning the way one buys a car, a sound system, or a hamburger. Tuition and state funding combine to buy professional direction and assistance to your own study as well as a fair and careful assessment of your progress. It never buys the right not to attend class, to fail to complete assigned work, or to practice a radical individualism that distracts the instructor and classmates with impunity. By agreeing to teach the class, I agree to provide the direction, assistance, and assessment. By enrolling in the class, you have created obligations for yourself. If you do not meet them, you will not succeed.
My basic assumption is that students are adults preparing to be professionals. They should understand that the way they conduct business has a direct influence on their success in the class and other tangible if longer-term results (For example, you are not only completing the requirements for the courses you are currently taking, you are developing professional relationships with your instructors, who will in due course serve as your primary references as you seek admission to graduate schools, employment, or other types of professional or educational opportunities).
To be more specific, I expect students to come to each class meeting on time, prepared and ready to concentrate on the tasks at hand. I further expect students to prepare all assignments with scrupulous attention to detail and directions by the stipulated deadlines. And I tolerate no unprofessional distractions such as gum chewing, sleeping in class, using beepers or cell phones (either for incoming or outgoing calls). Students who create such distractions will leave the class.
Deadline for Withdrawal: The deadline for withdrawing from any class with a grade of W is October 8. Students may withdraw from a class after that date only in the case of hardship. Hardship withdrawals are determined in the office of the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, not by instructors or department chairs. Students who are granted hardship withdrawals must withdraw from all their classes.
Compliance with Act regarding disabilities:
The instructor will make accommodations to meet special needs of
students with
documented disabilities. It is the responsibility of the student
to
inform the instructor of any such need and to provide the appropriate
documentation.
Department of English and Philosophy Plagiarism Policy
The Department of English and Philosophy defines plagiarism as taking
personal
credit for the words and ideas of others as they are presented in
electronic,
print, and verbal sources. The Department expects that students
will
accurately credit sources in all assignments. Plagiarism is
grounds for
failing the course.
Other Policies
* Campus e-mail
(myUWG) will
be the official method for all communication by e-mail
* No extra credit will be allowed in this course
* Work done for another course may be accepted to
satisfy
requirements in this course, provided both instructors agree to accept
such
work. Students should keep in mind, however, that the same work
might be
evaluated according to different criteria, given the different
outcomes.
Assignments
Reading
Rubric. Use this guide to
prepare for class on the days indicated in the schedule below.
The Narratives
Miniature Narrative: Using Jean Rhys' "I Used to Live Here
Once" as
a model, write your own mini narrative titled "I Used to Live Here
Once." Select a place you once lived, or a place you know well,
and
write a two-page, typed, double-spaced narrative set there. Be
sure to
make your narrative a narrative. That is, approach the place
through a
specific situation in time, as Rhys does, for example.
Another
important consideration is the need to establish a clear and consistent
perspective, or point of view in your narrative. Use the
class
e-mail list I sent out to distribute your narrative, attached as a Word
document, by 12:30, Tuesday, August 26.
Dramatic
Monologue: For this
assignment you will write a dramatic monologue
of one typed-double spaced page. As with the mini narrative, be
sure your
monologue is a narrative set at a specific place in time. The
entire monologue, by definition, must be given in the voice of a single
character and must be spoken in a dramatic situation (at least one
listener
must be present). Don't confuse the monologue with episotolary
form (a
letter). Use the class e-mail list to distribute your monolgue by
12:30
on Thursday, September 11.
Dramatic Monolgue Critiques: We'll workshop some of your
monologues on
Tuesday, September 16. Those assignments have now been made, so
check the
schedule. Those responsible for primary critiques should again
prepare a
half-page formal critque of the piece and editorial commentary on the
manuscript. In addition, primary reviewers will prepare to
"perform" a reading of the monologue as another level of
interpretation. All will participate in the workshop, of
course.
Use the details in the written assignment to help you evaluate the
success of
each piece.
Narrative in the Vernacular: Using Bambara's "My Man Bovanne" as a model write a one-page narrative in vernacular language or dialect. Concentrate on realizing characterization through voice. The narrative might be but is not required to be a dramatic monologue.
Full Narrative: Write a
six to eight page (double-spaced) short story that represents a
completed action, with exposition, conflict, rising action that
includes complications of conflict, climax and resolution. You
may draw on one of our earlier shorter narrative assignments if you
wish, but that is not a requirement. See the schedule for
distribution dates.
All students in the
class are encouraged to write in the mode of
literary mainstream fiction and to avoid genre fiction: fantasy,
romance,
western, science fiction, etc. This is not to say that elements
associated with these genres may not be used for the writing done for
the
class, only that the strict adherence to the requirements of such
genres lies
outside the scope of this course.
The assignments must be distributed to the class and the instructor as an e-mail attachment on the dates assigned in the schedule (forthcoming).
Analytical/Critical
Assignments:
First Analytical Essay: For this
assignment, due October 2 in hard copy at the beginning of class, you
will select one of the story we have studied using the Reading Rubric
and write a critical interpretation of the story. The
chief expectation is that you demonstrate the logic by which you arrive
at your interpretation of the story through close examination of the
text. To make sure your focus is sufficiently narrow, select a
single element or comination of elements--character, language, imagery,
tone, atmosphere, etc.) and demonstate the role the element(s) play(s)
in developing the story's theme. Use your responses for the
Reading Rubric to help determine your interests and make your
selections.
While close reading is a requirement, you may well combine that with
any number of theoretical approaches (historical, psychological,
mythic, feminist, Marxist/social) if you wish. No secondary
sources are required but may be used if properly documented. For
more information see the grading criteria on your syllabus.
The paper
should be 3-4 typed, doubled-spaced pages in MLA format.
Second Analytical Essay: Read
chapter VII in the Oates text devoted to the genre of horror, including
Lovecraft's "The Rats in the Walls" and King's "The Man in the Black
Suit." Use all that material and more if you wish to first
establish at least three major conventions of the genre and second
compare/constrast the handling of one or more of those
conventions in the two stories.
The paper
should be 4-5 typed, doubled-spaced pages in MLA format.
The Critiques. The critiques consist of detailed notes on the original manuscript plus a formal written critical evaluation of the work. They should be written in an analytical prose style appropriate for an academic paper. Please note that three critiques are due on three separate dates for each student.. Each critique should evaluate and provide detailed commentary on the effectiveness of the narrative appropriate to the nature of the assignment in the case of the shorter assignments. Iin the case of the full narrative, the critique should provide detailed analysis of plot, characterization, setting and atmosphere, style and tone (including higher elements of language such as imagery), and, finally, the total effectiveness of the work--remarking on both strengths and weaknesses of the story and making specific suggestions for revision. Critiques of full narratives do not have to be organized in the order listed above. Let the story itself determine the order of importance in which its elements are addressed. Critiques of shorter assignment should be a half page, typed and double spaced. Critiques of full narratives should be 2-3 typed, doubled-spaced pages in length.
Critiques, and all discussion of a student-author's stories, should always address the text, never the author. Critiques sharpen the thinking of the reviewer and aid the writer only when they are honest and respectful. Students will read their prepared critiques to the class to spark further discussion of the story under consideration. Authors must be present but may not join in the discussion of their work unless invited to do so by the instructor.
Students must provide two copies of the critique: one for the student author and one for the instructor. In addition, they must provide for the instructor one copy of the original story with their critical remarks on the text. The original goes back to the author, of course.
A word here on manuscript format: All stories and critiques must be typed and double-spaced and printed in 12 point Times New Roman or Courier font. In addition, all manuscripts should observe the standards of academic and business practice, with one inch margins all around. All pages after the first should be numbered in the top right corner. Stories must have a title and byline centered at the top of the first page (no cover page is required). For example:
Ruins
by
Randy Hendricks
Critiques should begin with the following information centered at the top of page one:
Critique of "title
of
narrative"
by
name of author of narrative
Prepared by name of reviewer
An additional word on standard English. While in fiction the element of voice may demand some variation from the rules of grammar and diction, only writers who are masters of the rules can break those rules effectively. In short, realistic dialogue or 1st person narration are certainly allowed in the stories written for this class, but such techniques must justify themselves. Mechanics, grammar, sentence coherence and the larger matters of organization and coherence in a composition do count in this class (of course these latter elements take quite different forms in fiction and academic prose).
Total Participation. Means preparation for class as
well as
attendance, means arriving on time and staying for the duration, means
taking
an interested part in class discussion even on those nights you're not
responsible for either a story or a formal critique, means a
willingness to
accept or even thoughtfully reject constructive criticism from other
students
and the instructor, means serious revision of creative work in light of
that
criticism and interest in your own development as a writer, means
getting clean
copies of assignments distributed to the class and the instructor on
time,
means taking the responsibility to get distributed materials should you
miss a
meeting, means undertaking assignments that may be given to you
individually by
the instructor in the interest of your own growth, means respectful
behavior
toward all members of the class and the instructor, means turning off
your cell
phone at the door on the way in.
Schedule
Date Anthology Assignment Workshop
|
|
|||
|
August 19 |
Introductions |
||
|
21 |
Oates, Introduction, "Why We Read,
Why We Write" (xiii); "Miniature Narratives" (3) |
||
|
26 |
Lawrence, “Tickets, Please” (429) Reading Rubric. |
Draft Distribution of Miniature Narrative Assignment |
|
|
28 |
Workshop Faulkner, “That Evening Sun,” (
446) Reading Rubric. |
Narrative: Abercrombie. Critique: Franklin Narrative: Cserjes. Critique: Graves Narrative: Erdman, R. Critique: Hill Narrative: Erdman, S. Critique: Mathern |
|
|
September 2 |
Workshop O’Connor, “A Temple of the Holy Ghost” (461) Reading Rubric. |
Narrative: Franklin. Critique: Langley Narrative: Graves. Critique: Erdman, S |
|
|
4 |
Workshop Oates, “Dramatic Monologues” (69) Oates, “Lethal” (71) Martin, “Twirler” Mann, “Still Life” |
Narrative: Hill. Critique: Roberson Narrative: Jones. Critique: Abercrombie Narrative: Lamourt. Critique: Jones |
|
|
9 |
Workshop Welty, “Why I Live at the P. O.”
(audio, we’ll listen together in class) Dramatic monologue assignment |
Narrative: Langley.
Critique: Cserjes Narrative: Roberson. Critique: Lamourt, Lindsay Narrative: Lindsay. Critique: entire group, no primary critique assigned |
|
|
11 |
Doctorow, “The Writer in the Family” (480) Reading Rubric |
Dramatic Monologue Distribution |
|
|
16 |
Workshop Oates, “Re-visions: Reappropriations” Genesis 19 (203) Ostriker, “The Cave” (206) Ovid, “The Story of Daedalus and Icarus” 9218) Ellison, “Fever” (221) Grimm’s Fairy Tales “Little Snow-White” (227) Sexton “Snow White and the Seven
Dwarfs” 235 Reappropriation Assignment |
<>Monologue: Abercrombie. Critique: Mathern<> Monologue: Cserjes. Critique: Graves Monologue: Erdman, R. Critique: Franklin Monologue: Erdman, S. Critique: Hill
|
|
|
18 |
Atwood, “The Man From Mars” (496); Mukherjee, “Jasmine” (514) |
||
|
23 |
|
Reappropriation Assignment Distribution |
|
|
25 |
Workshop Ford “Communist” (529) Reading Rubric. |
Narrative: Franklin. Critique: Erdman, S Narrative: Graves. Critique: Langley Narrative: Lindsay. Critique: Lamourt |
|
|
30 |
Heyen “Any Sport” (543) Reading Rubric. |
||
|
Oct. 2 |
Bambara, “My Man Bovanne”
(559) Reading Rubric. Assignment: Writing in the vernacular First Analytical Essay Due |
||
|
7 |
Oates “Narrative in Other Modes”
(241)
|
Distribution of Vernacular Writing Assignment |
|
|
9 |
Fall Break. No
Classes |
||
|
14 |
Workshop Frazier, “Dating Your Mom” 588 Monty Python skit (video, We’ll
view it together in class) Writing Contest Assignment |
Narrative: Hill. Critique: Jones Narrative: Jones. Critique: Roberson Narrative: Lamourt. Critique: Abercrombie |
|
|
16 |
Jones, "The Pugilist at Rest" 676 |
Contest Assignment Distributed |
|
|
21 |
Workshop Anthology Assignment TBA |
Narrative:
Langley. Critique: Erdman, R Narrative: Roberson. Critique: Lindsay
Jesse
Abercrombie |
|
|
23 |
Full Narrative Workshop |
Narrative:
Jesse Critique: Josh Narrative: Katelyn Critique: Tiffany Narrative: Rebecca Critique: Joy Full Narrative Distributions: Stephanie Erdman Kira Franklin Brandi Graves |
|
|
28 |
Full Narrative Workshop |
Narrative:
Stephanie Critique: David L. Narrative: Kira Critique: Jimmy Narrative: Brandi Critique: Nathan Full Narrative Distributions: David Hill Nathan Jones Jimmy Lamourt |
|
|
30 |
Full Narrative Workshop |
Narrative:
David H. Critique: Brandi Narrative: Nathan Critique: Kira Narrative: Jimmy Critique: Stephanie Full Narrative Distributions: David Langley Joy Lindsey Tiffany Mathern Josh Roberson |
|
|
Nov 4 |
Full Narrative Workshop |
Narrative:
David L Critique: David H. Narrative: Joy Critique: Rebecca Narrative: Tiffany Critique Katelyn Narrative: Josh Critique: Jesse |
|
|
6 |
No Class: Instructor at Conference |
||
|
11 |
Day off to work on portfolios |
||
|
13 |
Individual Portfolio Conference |
||
|
18 |
Individual Portfolio Conference |
||
|
20 |
Individual Portfolio Conference |
||
|
25 |
Individual Portfolio Conference
|
||
|
27 |
Thanksgiving; No Class |
||
|
Dec 1 |
Wrap up. |
||
|
4 |
Final Portfolios Due by Noon |
|
|
GRADING
CRITERIA FOR ALL ASSIGNMENTS 2000-LEVEL AND ABOVE (This
applies to
the two analytical essays)
Note:
A passing grade on any assignment first assumes competence in the
mechanics of
standard written English.
C To earn a “C,” a student must
B
To earn a “B,” a student must meet the minimum requirements for a
“C” essay
plus
A To earn an “A,” a student must meet the minimum requirements for a “B” essay plus:
· Provide a sophisticated thesis that demonstrates independent thinking.
· Support all claims/ideas with appropriate, fully analyzed examples and compelling, insightful arguments.
· Show persuasive logical development and organization throughout.
· Maintain a distinctive voice and consistent viewpoint that incorporates interesting and varied style.
· Provide secondary sources, where applicable, that demonstrate independent research in the field.
·
Enter
into meaningful dialogue with secondary sources, such that the student
is not
just proving someone else’s point but developing original ideas in
relation to
research material.
D A “D” grade results from
· Failing to respond clearly to the assignment, or
· A lack of qualities listed under the minimum requirements for a “C,” or
·
Insufficient
control of standard written English, resulting in substantial errors
that cause
confusion or incoherence.
F An “F” grade results from
·
Two
or more of the faults listed in “D” above.