Expectations:
The grading criteria outlined on the syllabus apply. My
expectations
for the paper are fairly common expectations for papers of academic
critical
analysis, but I do emphasize the following:
1. Thesis: a well presented argument that provides
readers
with an interpretation of a text or texts. The entire paper
should
be organized and focused
by this argument.
2. Development: The primary support for your claim must
come from your own critical analysis of the primary text(s).
Develop
your argument with clearly
articulated subpoints supported by discussion of appropriate passages
from the work(s). Do not weaken your paper by quoting excessively
or
substituting long quotations for discussion. Remember that your
task is to convince readers of your interpretation, and that cannot be
done simply by copying
what an author has written.
3. Research: Your thesis must be grounded in appropriate
criticism. While you will certainly consult more sources, you
must
demonstrate your
familiarity with a substantial body of criticism related to your topic
by referring to 2 or more critical essays or books chapters beyond what
is provided in one of your textbooks as secondary sources in
your
paper.
Reading critical interpretations should sharpen your own thinking and
perhaps bring to light issues you had not considered before. But
do not use secondary
sources to "prove" your own interpretation. Use them instead
to demonstrate your awareness of some of what has been said on the
subject
you're
exploring and to demonstrate for your readers what you are adding to
the discussion or where you differ from what other critics have said.
In addition to a search of the library catalog, you must
conduct
a search of the MLA Bibliographical Index for articles relevant to your
topic. The Index is
available online through Ingram Library/Galileo.
Do not rely on or cite such sources as Cliff's Notes or similar
sources
available in print or online. While such "notes" might help
unravel
some of the knots
presented by the difficult works we read, they are often unreliable
and are always unauthoritative. Similarly, while a number of
respectable
journals are
available online now, personal web sites posted to present an
individual's
views are not reliable sources for research. Do not cite such
sources.
4. Documentation: Document sources completely and
correctly
using MLA style. Use a handbook or The MLA Style Manual
and Guide to Scholarly Publishing, 2nd edition, 1998, available
in the Reference section of the library, PN147 .G444.
5. The final paper should be 10-12 pages in length, typed,
double-spaced
with one inch margins all around. Graduate papers should be 12-15 pages
in
length. The Works Cited page should be the final numbered
page.
It does not count toward the length requirements, however.