PHIL 4300-01W: Senior Seminar

University of West Georgia

Fall 2010

 

Instructions for Synopsis and Leading Class Discussion

 

Each student will be required to lead discussion of a portion of a reading assignment once during the course of the semester. The student who is leading a given day’s class will begin by presenting a synopsis of that text to the class:

·         The synopsis is a detailed summary of the ideas, claims and arguments that Peirce gives in the relevant reading assignment.

·         Before you begin writing your synopsis, you should read through the material carefully at least once and pick out the claim(s) that you think are the most important, as well as the reasons that Peirce gives for believing them. Once you’ve done this initial reading, reflect on the reading as a whole. Ask yourself: What is Peirce trying to do in this reading, and how does he go about doing it? Get clear on how you answer these questions before you begin writing the synopsis itself.

·         Your synopsis should summarize the reading, emphasizing what you take to be its most important claims and arguments, using your own words as much as possible and quoting Peirce sparingly. It should be clearly written and organized, so that even someone who is very unfamiliar with Peirce’s work can understand it.

·         Your class presentation should take between 15 and 20 minutes. You may use the white board and/or a PowerPoint presentation, if you wish.

·         Together, the presentation and the synopsis will count for 15% of your total course grade. I will grade the synopsis using the same standards I normally apply to formal writing (organization, clarity, grammar, punctuation and spelling will all count).

·         You must turn in one printed copy of the synopsis to me at the beginning of class.

·         Synopsis length: 1500-2000 words.

·         I encourage you to meet with me to discuss your synopsis before you present it to the class.

 

On the first day of class, I will assign specific dates for leading class discussion based on a random draw. Once your date as been assigned, you may negotiate an exchange of dates with another student; but you must let me know as soon as possible after you have negotiated that exchange.

 

 

Schedule

(note that there will be no student presentation

on the dates when other class materials are due):

 

 

topic and student

reading

materials due

8/23 M

Theory of Cognition: Introspection & Intuition

Student:__L. Waits________________

 

EP 1:29-38

--

8/25 W

Theory of Cognition: Thought-Signs

Student:__A. Barker________________

 

EP 1:38-51

--

8/30 M

Theory of Cognition: Cognitionism & Reality

EP 1:51-55

intellectual autobiography due

9/1 W

Inquiry: Belief and Doubt

Student:___J, Morse_______________

 

EP 1:109-115

--

9/6 M

LABOR DAY – no classes

--

--

9/8 W

Inquiry: Four Methods of Fixing Belief

Student:____K. Murphy____________

 

EP 1:115-20

resume due

9/13 M

Inquiry: Realism & the Method of Science

 

EP 1:120-23

--

9/15 W

Pragmatism: The Pragmatic Maxim

Student: _____P. Yu_______________

 

EP 1:124-32

--

9/20 M

Class does not meet; Dr. Lane out of town.

9/22 W

Pragmatism: Truth & Reality

Student:______T. Garcia____________

 

EP 1:132-39

--

9/27 M

Pragmatism: Truth & Reality

EP 1:139-41

abstract due

[peer editing]

9/29 W

Scientific Metaphysics

Student: ____R. Smith______________

 

EP 2:331-339; EP 2:42-50

--

10/4 M

Scholastic Realism

Student:____D. Vinson____________

 

EP 1:87-92

--

10/6 W

Extreme Scholastic Realism: Generals

Student:_____P. Avery_____________

 

EP 2:179-83

--

10/11 M

Extreme Scholastic Realism: Possibility

EP 2:183-86

prospectus & annotated bibliography due

[peer editing]

10/13 W

From Pragmatism to Pragmaticism

 

EP 2:331-38

--

10/18 M

Pragmaticism and Generals

Student:_______B. Victor___________

 

EP 2:338-45

--