| 4985 Summer 2009 Museums in France course TERM PROJECT/PRESENTATION Due Dates
For this semester, you will prepare a sort of preliminary research report on a group of museum objects or works of architecture or architectural features. Start exploring the sites you will or would visit in France and/or Atlanta, depending on whether you will make the trip to France. Select the one you want and claim it, because no two people will work on the same topic. E-mail me to claim your choice, and I will post it in the grid. If the one you wanted is selected by someone else, you should choose another. You should develop a sort of theme as you accrue selections, from which you will develop a thesis about the group of works. If you have a specific idea about which you are uncertain, consult with me to see if it is feasible. For each of our meetings, you will prepare the Museum Object Writing for one of the works in your group. Your final report will be posted on the class CourseDen site and everyone will be able to read the reports of the other students in the class and to comment upon them. You will submit your work through the dropbox and I will publish it (before I make comments or grade them). Your work will include the following: · A basic research statement (3-4 pages of text : 1200-1500 words) about the nature of the work, in which you discuss 3 or 4 specific aspects of the work to support your line of argument. This might address the use of imagery, of media, of formal principles, of models, etc., in ways that differ from other works that are in some respects similar. An example would be a particular Bible story that appears in different manuscripts or, perhaps, in a wall painting and a stained glass window, and the distinctive differences in the two or more works.· 3-6 images to support your inquiry and your statements. These should be .jpg and relatively small (less than 500K, so they will not overload the CourseDen system). Supplementally or alternatively (for initial analyses only --NOT for class presentation, nor for the final project), you may use references to specific websites (by inclusion of their addresses) or to your text book. They should be properly captioned as per this sample:
FIG. 1. CONVIVIUM OF AENEAS AND DIDO, folio 100v of ROMAN VERGIL (VERGILIUS ROMANUS), 6th Century. 8.5 X 8.75." Rome, Vatican Library, Vergil Ms Vat. Lat. 3867. (http://www.vortigernstudies.org.uk/artlit/vergilius.htm) Caption formula: Fig. #. Artist/Architect. Title of the Work, Title of Larger Work of Which it is a Part. Location if Architecture. date, medium, size. Museum location of object. (source of your image -- abbreviated, with full citation in the bibliography)
PHASE ONE: RATIONALE & THESIS STATEMENT ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY, Due June 19th, by 5 PMRationale: Write a brief statement (1-2 sentences) about why you selected your particular artist, works, or theme. What was it about the topic or the work that made it seem like a good choice for your research and writing? Do you see the work as related to your own or to some long-held interest ... or was there some other aspect of it that intrigued you or made them seem worthy of further investigation on your part?Thesis Statement: Another brief statement, probably a paragraph long. By the time you have created a good annotated bibliography, you will have likely already developed and refined a sort of thesis, as the thought processes for the two parts go hand-in-hand. The thesis will result from your careful thinking process about the particular significance of your topic and your careful consideration of the work, and from collecting and organizing the materials you have found on your selection, as you have searched for bibliography that seems relevant and that has potential for illuminating the possible links between what you think important and what can be supported by scholarly writings. Be careful to distinguish between what you consider known or apparent facts and what can actually be substantiated through research. As you progress and accumulate thoughts and research materials, their relative significance will become clearer and your" working thesis" will emerge and become increasingly defined and refined. You will develop a basic or main idea, an argument that you think you can support with evidence but that may need adjustment along the way. You must be prepared to change direction as the evidence requires. Remember the dictates about PLAGIARISM and intellectual honesty -- do not cheat yourself out of an education.A good thesis will be definitive and arguable. To test the strength of your thesis, consider these issues: Do I answer the question about the specific significance of the particular works I am examining? Re-reading with a view to whether you have bought together works that are related in their relevance to the thesis after constructing a working thesis can help you repair an argument that misses the focus of the question. For instance, if you had sought to know the significance of Monet's "haystack" paintings, and then stated a thesis that Monet, in a specific group of paintings, had an overarching concern of showing the morning light in different seasons of the year, but had included in your thesis statement that none of Monet's paintings can be seen in Cleveland, it would likely be clear to you that these ideas have nothing to do with one another. If you had selected Monet, he would clearly NOT fit the requirement that his work be considered as medieval. If you did select a medieval artist or set of works, state clearly and specifically what is distinctively medieval about the work, as well as how it relates to the phase of evolution in medieval art in which it appears. Have I taken a position that others might challenge or oppose? If your thesis simply states facts that no one would, or even could, disagree with, it's possible that you are simply providing a summary or your research findings, rather than making an argument and showing your own thought processes. Just the gathering of research materials is not sufficient basis for the thesis statement or for the ultimate writing -- there needs to be clear evidence of your own thought and hypothesis. Is my thesis statement specific enough? Thesis statements that are too vague often do not have a strong argument. If your thesis contains words like "good" or "successful," see if you could be more specific: why is something "good"; what specifically makes something "successful"? Judgment of the value of art, in itself, rarely has significance. Rather, focus on the specific relevance in context. For example, if you posit that Monet's haystack paintings mark a phase of Impressionism in which the focus on light conditions and and atmospheric phenomena were more important than the farmland and the activity of gathering hay into stacks as agrarian activities, you would have a much stronger thesis than if you stated that Monet's most beautiful paintings were of haystacks. Does my thesis pass the "So what?" test? If a reader's first response is, "So what?" then you need to clarify, to forge a relationship, or to connect to a larger issue. If you had said the Monet's most beautiful paintings were of haystacks, a reader would be quite justified in saying "So what?" and insisting that you offer them something much more specific. Does my essay support my thesis specifically and without wandering? If your thesis and the body of your essay do not seem to go together, one of them has to change. It's o.k. to change your working thesis to reflect things you have figured out in the course of writing your paper. Remember, always reassess and revise your writing as necessary. Does my thesis pass the "how and why?" test? If a reader's first response is "how?" or "why?" your thesis may be too open-ended and lack guidance for the reader. See what you can add to give the reader a better take on your position right from the beginning.This set of suggestions is based on those at: http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/thesis.html . For further ideas on how to approach the task of thesis writing, you should visit that site or scour the web for similar ones -- there are many. Annotated Bibliography: .You need a minimum of 5 references: 2 scholarly books and 3 scholarly journal articles (you may add websites only if they are scholarly, and only in addition to the 5 required here) instructions for annotation below. You can or should have sources for images that are used for only that purpose, not for research. List them as bibliographic entries, but they do not need annotation other than to say they are used for images, if that is all they are used for. They are then not part of the required 5 sources. Do not use your textbook or any other textbook as one of your 5 main sources. Encyclopedia entries may be a place to get started, and may be cited if used, but they are not to be used as one of your main sources either. ______________________________________________________________________________ WHAT IS AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY? An annotated bibliography is a list of citations of books, articles, and documents. Each citation is followed by a brief (usually about 150 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph, the annotation. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited. ANNOTATIONS VS. ABSTRACTS Abstracts are the purely descriptive summaries often found at the beginning of scholarly journal articles or in periodical indexes. They are not sufficient as annotations -- you must state how the source fits your exploration. Annotations are descriptive and critical; they expose the author's point of view, clarity and appropriateness of expression, and authority. Relate the value of the source to its importance in your study and your use of it for this project. THE PROCESS Creating an annotated bibliography calls for the application of a variety of intellectual skills: concise exposition, succinct analysis, and informed library research. First, locate and record citations to books, periodicals, and documents that may contain useful information and ideas on your topic. Briefly examine and review the actual items. Then choose those works that provide a variety of perspectives on your topic. Do not just choose the first five that you find. Cite the book, article, or document using the appropriate style. (Chicago style)(find on UWG library website or Google to find on another university website) Art History uses footnotes (preferred) or endnotes. DO NOT insert parenthetical references into your writing. Write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article. Include one or more sentences that (a) evaluate the authority or background of the author, (b) comment on the intended audience, (c) compare or contrast this work with another you have cited, or (d) explain how this work illuminates your bibliography for the topic. The above paragraphs are taken from the website, slightly modified: http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill28.htm#what For further information on how to create the annotated bibliography, visit that site. TOPICS:. These may be selected from the various sites and museums, around whatever theme/thesis you are developing, in the expectation that you will respond in a way that will lead you to expand upon the idea. They need to become increasingly specific as your project evolves, so you will need to make them so, depending your own choice of works to exemplify an idea or theme. As always, we are concerned with specifics works and particular aspects of those works. Do not pick something that you have already researched for another class. If there is something that interests you, of which you are uncertain, that seems to fit the framework of the project, you could ask to do the study on them, subject to my approval. Submit your requests through the class CourseDen e-mail. First come, first served. I will post your name next to the topic that you will research, with a more specific description as appropriate. For most of these, you should develop the idea a bit before you settle into it as your choice – for instance, a specific manuscript or the same type of image in several different manuscripts – whether close in time or across several periods. Likewise for an architectural feature, or the borrowing of motifs or traits, influences that migrate from one culture or form to another, or whatever. If you have difficulty deciding, or are uncertain about the suitability of your choice, plan to consult with me in my office this week or at class on the 12th. You must make make your selection by that day. Clearly, a report of this short length cannot be exhaustive, but it should be insightful and to the point. It should not be primarily biographical nor anecdotal, although those issues may be a minor or explanatory part of your discussion. Your writing should be based in your research about the medieval character of the works. You may select your few works and discuss them and their specific significance without drawing general conclusions of any sort, as long as what you say is accurate and meaningful. Your writing should be based firmly in the scholarly sources you use, rather than too-creative or showing conjectural interpretation. Especially avoid generalizations. And make sure you acknowledge the ways that you are using your sources. AVOID QUOTATION. Rather paraphrase what the scholar has said and credit them with the thought. Clearly distinguish any of your own thinking from what you have read. Class Presentations: Prepare a Power Point Presentation of your image(s) that you will share with the class. We will project it for everyone to see and you should be prepared to discuss why it is one of your choices and how it fits into your theme/thesis. Bring it to class on a thumbdrive. The computers in 203 are PCs. For the Fridays in June classes, you should prepare a 1-2 minute presentation. For the Final presentation (July 27th -28th), you should prepare a polished 5-7 minute presentation (also with PowerPoint). It will be more formal and you should plan accordingly -- you will dress up -- business-like attire -- no shorts, no halter tops, no jeans. Final Written Presentation due July 28th, in class, by classtime -- NO EXCEPTIONS): You have a choice of format for this. It can be a catalogue-type, or term-paper type. For the catalogue, you would create an introductory essay for the group of objects that you have researched and follow that with an individual essay on each of the objects/site/structures. If you would like to see some samples of this type, please arrange to meet me asap. The alternative format is a regular termpaper. Either would require a clear and cogent thesis and a total written text of 1300-1500 words, exclusive of bibliography. In either format, the presentation should be polished and professional, but the intellectual content is paramount. Do not get too caught up in having fun with the layout, at the expense of the information and thought. Either format would include the presentation of the images, properly incorporated into the format, and correctly captioned, as above. |