SPCW, 16th Annual Conference

July 18th-23rd, 2009

Pine Lake, New York

 

Saturday, July 18th

 

6:30 p.m.

Welcome and Opening Remarks

 

Sunday, July 19h

 

9:00-10:30 Theme: “Whither Liberal Arts?”

 

Peter Mehl

“Educating for Life: Liberal Arts and the Human Spirit”

 

Donald Poochigian

Science as a Human Endeavor: On the Odd Bifurcation of Science and the Humanities”

 

10:30-10:45: BREAK

 

10:45-12:15

 

Aisha Raees

“Revolutionary Islam: A Self-Cultivating Identity through Education”

 

Stanley Konecky

“Basic Questions of Ethics and Moral Education”

 

12:15-1:30: LUNCH

 

1:30-3:00

 

Karin Fry

“Opening a Conversation between Secularism and Christianity in the United States

 

Christopher Collins

“Multiculturalism, Metaphysics and Alain Locke’s Post-Metaphysical Alternative”

 

3:00-3:15:  BREAK

 

3:15-4:45:

 

Herzl Baruch

“Toleration in a global world from a liberal perspective”

 

Mark Sanders

“Deliberative Democratic Citizenship”

 

Levente Szentkiralyi

Lockean Political Theory & Eminent Domain: An Allowance for Takings?”

 

6:00 DINNER

 

 

Monday, July 20th

 

9:00-10:30

 

Robert Stolorow

Portkeys, Resurrective Ideology, and Collective Trauma”

 

Joshua Simmonds

“Recovering the Satellite: Heidegger and Technology”

 

10:30-10:45: BREAK

 

10:45-12:15

 

Wendy L. Lee

“The Uses and Abuses of Reproductive Technologies: Charting a Feminist Response to the Future of Reproductive Technology”

 

Dr. Howard Ponzer

“Obama, Change, and Gender Equality”

 

12:15-1:30: LUNCH

 

1:30-3:00

 

Aaron Lercher

“Health Care Prioritization and Autonomy”

 

Benjamin Rider

“The Ethics of Superlongevity: Should We Cure Death?”

 

3:00-3:15:  BREAK

 

3:15-5:30:

 

David Chan

“Morality and Decisions on the Ground”

 

Liam Harte

“Could New Terrorism Exist? A Philosophical Critique of the ‘Expert Analysis’”

 

J. Jeremy Wisnewski

“Racism and Sexism as Tools in Torture’s Defense: A Cautionary Note”

 

DINNER 6pm

 

Tuesday, July 21st

 

9:00-10:30

 

Caroline Meline

“Is it Natural or Unnatural to Follow the Golden Rule?”

 

Paul Wilson

“The Luck of the Draw”

 

10:30-10:45: BREAK

 

10:45-12:15

 

George A. Teschner

“Saussure and the Metalinguistics of Ancient Taoism”

 

Edward J. Grippe

“A Platonic Challenge to Homeric Justice and Machiavellian Political Assumptions: A Socratic Therapy for Contemporary Times”

 

12:15-1:30: LUNCH

 

1:30-3:00

 

Ralph D. Ellis

“The Phenomenology of Alexithymia as a Clue to the Intentionality of Emotion”

 

Aline M. Ramos

“Scientific revolutions and the crisis of science: an examination of historicity and its role for the scientific community according to Thomas Kuhn and Edmund Husserl”

 

3:00-3:15:  BREAK

 

3:15-5:30:

 

Peter G. Res, “The Retrieval of Authentic Care: An Exploratory Analysis of Being-With in Aristotle and Heidegger”

 

Joe Frank Jones, III

“Heidegger and the Aporia of Beginnings and Endings: Breaking the Chains of Phenomenological Deconstruction”

 

Janet Donohoe

“The Place of Home”

 

DINNER 6pm

 

8 PM Business Meeting

 

Wednesday, July 22nd

 

9:00-10:30

 

Jeffrey P. Fry

“Gluttons for Sport”

 

Ileana F. Szymanski

“Habits, Food, and Happiness”

 

10:30-10:45: BREAK

 

10:45-11:30

 

Joseph Martire

“Morally Justified Conduct in Relation to Religious Belief and Political Association”

 

 

12:00-1:00: LUNCH

 

Afternoon:

Time to explore Pine Lake (swimming, hiking, etc)

 

DINNER 6pm

 

Thursday, July 23rd

 

9:00-10:30

 

Todd Jones

“Customs can’t be causal”

 

Mark Sentesy

“Parts of the Word or Parts of the Machine? The Concept of Things in Greek and Modern Natural Philosophy”

 

LUNCH (we’re going out!)

 

Goodbyes

 

 

Participants

 

Herzl Baruch is a lecturer in Beit Berl College and head of the section of philosophy. He was awarded PhD degree in philosophy (Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv) on June 2002. The Thesis of my thesis: “From Scientific Theories to Recommendations for Actions”. His theoretical topics of interest and research include philosophy and education: The relations between epistemology and ethics; Rousseau’s, Dewey’s and Popper’s general and educational philosophies; Plato’s dialogues; Philosophy in childhood and youth; Child’s literature, films and Educational philosophy. 

 

David Chan is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point.  He came to the United States from Singapore, where he has taught at the National University of Singapore.  He studied philosophy at the University of Melbourne in Australia (B.A. Honors) and at Stanford University (Ph.D.).  His research interests are in moral psychology, virtue ethics, the ethics of war, medical ethics, and Greek philosophy.  He organized an international conference on 'Values, Rational Choice, and the Will' in April 2004, and is editor of Moral Psychology Today, a selection of papers from the conference published by Springer Books.  He is currently writing books on action theory, and on the ethics of war.

 

Chris Collins is currently a graduate student in philosophy at Fordham University.  He is interested primarily in ethics (broadly construed), theories of personal autonomy and moral responsibility, philosophy of law and American Pragmatism.  Chris has been a practicing lawyer for the past 19 years. 

 

Janet Donohoe is a Professor and Director of the Philosophy Program at the University of West Georgia.  She has published a book on Husserl’s ethics, as well as several articles ranging in topics from feminist phenomenology to a phenomenology of place and on such authors as Derrida, Benjamin, and Heidegger.

 

Ralph Ellis was drafted for the Vietnam War, served in the U.S. Navy as a Torpedoman, earned a paltry existence as an itinerant jazz saxophonist for a few years, and earned a PhD in philosophy at Duquesne University and a postdoctoral M.S. in Public Affairs at the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University. He has worked as a social worker for the states of Pennsylvania and Georgia as well as teaching philosophy, and has taught at CAU for 23 years. He is interested in social/political philosophy and integrating the social sciences with philosophy. His books include How the Mind Uses the Brain (forthcoming 2009); Questioning Consciousness;  Just Results: Ethical Foundations for Policy Analysis; Foundations of Civic Engagement (with Jim Sauer and Norm Fischer); Curious Emotions; Love and the Abyss; Eros in a Narcissistic Culture; Theories of Criminal Justice; Coherence and Verification in Ethics; An Ontology of Consciousness; and a critical thinking textbook, The Craft of Thinking. He is currently writing a new book on recent American imperialist wars called Why the Wars Never End.

 

Jeff Fry is an associate professor in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at Ball State University.  He also coordinates an interdepartmental minor in sports studies.  His areas of interest include ethics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of sport, philosophy of mind, and neurophilosophy.  He published a paper entitled "Living Like There's No Tomorrow: Urgency, Mindfulness, and Psychological Realism" in the spring 2009 issue of the journal Philosophy in the Contemporary World.

 

Karin Fry is an associate professor of philosophy at the University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point. She specializes in Continental philosophy and is author of Arendt: a Guide for the Perplexed (Continuum Press, 2009), as well as several articles on aesthetics, pop culture, and political theory. 

Edward J. Grippe is Professor of Philosophy and Religion at Norwalk Community College. He also currently works as a Philosophy and Ethics Adjunct in the College Bound Program at Bedford Hills Correctional Facility. Grippe has authored 12 journal articles in Philosophy and Ethics including: “Socrates Plato and the Tao”; “Evolution, Emergence, and The Scientific Method”; “Western Human Rights and Chinese National Autonomy: The Marketing of Universal Values”, and “Rorty’s Pragmatic Self: A House of Mirror” and  Fundamentalist Religion, Science, and Satyagarha” (forthcoming Fall 2007). He has also published a book for Continuum Publishers [June 2007] entitled Richard Rorty’s New Pragmatism: Neither Liberal Nor Free. He has been an active member in the Society for several years.

 

Liam Harte is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Westfield State College in Massachusetts.  He is author of “A Taxonomy of Terrorism” in Philosophy 9/11 (Open Court, 2005); “Must Terrorism Be Violent?” Review Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2008); and “Known Unknowns: How Philosophy Has Responded to Fear of the Post-9/11 World,” in The Impact of 9/11 on Religion and Philosophy: The Day Everything Changed? (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).

Joe Jones is Professor in and Chair of the Department of Philosophy and Religion at Barton College.  He is also Director of International Study.  He has been at Barton College since 1991.  He was the second editor of SPCW’s journal, Philosophy in the Contemporary World, and served a term as Director of SPCW.  He has been married to Polly Bush Jones since 1983 and has one daughter, Jesse Leandra, born in 1989, who fortunately is performing in the Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey’s production of “The Tempest” in Madison, NJ, where Joe and Polly were able to be in the audience on the way to this meeting.

 

Dr. Todd Jones is the Chair of the Philosophy Department at the University of Nevada,  Las Vegas.  He holds degrees in Anthropology and Cognitive Science, as well as Philosophy, and is a former chair of the UNLV Cultural Studies Program. He has recetly completing a on a book about the nature of collective intentions. 

 

Stanley Konecky taught briefly at the University of Rochester and since for umpteen years at Hartwick College.  His specialties are Existentialism, Ethics, and the Philosophy of Consciousness. His present paper attempts to inform moral education by examining both what makes human beings valuable and why humans do not consistently value humans.

 

Wendy Lynne Lee is professor of philosophy at Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania where she has taught for 17 years. Her AOS includes philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, philosophy of animal cognition, feminist theory, and environmental philosophy. She has recent publications in Environmental Philosophy, Ethics and the Environment, and Environmental Ethics, as well as a new book coming out in the Fall entitled Five Critical Issues for Contemporary Feminist Theory and Activism: Sexual Identity and Politics, Reproductive Technology, Economic Inequality and the Culture Industry, Religious Fundamentalism, and The Status of Nonhuman Others.

 

Aaron Lercher is Mathematics Librarian for Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge.  He is originally from upstate New York and is glad to be home for a brief vacation.  His philosophical work has mostly been in environmental ethics and philosophy of mathematics, and he is proud to have presented "Health Care Prioritization and Autonomy" at the most recent Eastern APA Meeting.

 

Peter Mehl attended Ohio University earning a BA and a MA in Philosophy; he earned his PhD in religion, ethics and the social sciences from the University of Chicago Divinity School. In 1990 he accepted a position in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Central Arkansas. He is currently Professor of Philosophy & Religion and Associate Dean in the College of Liberal Arts at UCA. The focus of his scholarship and teaching has been in ethics and philosophy of religion, especially Kierkegaard. He has published one book on Kierkegaard, Thinking through Kierkegaard: Existential Identity in a Pluralistic world, and contributed four chapters to edited books.  He has published in a wide variety of journals. His current focus is philosophy of liberal education and pragmatism.

 

Caroline W. Meline is an adjunct instructor of philosophy at St. Joseph’s University in Philadelphia, PA.  She received her PhD from Temple University in 2004, with a dissertation titled “The Creative Dimension of Subjectivity in Lacan, Freud, and Winnicott.”  At last year’s conference she talked about the will of the dieter, taking a soft determinist stance.  Now she is defending the thesis that morality has an evolutionary origin, which, she is relieved to note, is consistent with soft determinism.  Nonprofessionally, she is a mother of two and grandmother of four, avid gardener, and (not always consistent) leader of a dysfunctional three-dog pack.

 

Dr. Howard Ponzer is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Molloy College.  His publications deal primarily with German Idealism and Hegel’s dialectic, but he has also translated articles from German for publication in the US that deal with the ‘Unwritten Doctrine’ interpretation of Plato as well as the feminist critique of Fichte. He is presently working on a book that applies dialectical logic to contemporary issues in politics, culture, and morality.

 

Donald Poochigian is currently a Professor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy and Religion at the University of North Dakota, in Grand Forks, North Dakota. Although tending toward identity theory in respect to the theory of sets, his research interests are varied. In addition to the place of the humanities within higher education, recent research has concerned quantum theory, human rights, and the philosophy of economics.

 

Aisha Raees is a Phd. student in the department of philosophy at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. She is originally from Pakistan and came to the U.S. to pursue her education. Aisha’s main interests in philosophy are: Classical American Philosophy (Pragmatism, Cultural Inquiry), Peirce (Logic and Philosophy of Mind). More specifically, concepts of Mind and language focused on deriving a holistic account of these for moral inquiry and action. Cultural philosophy and theories of inquiry engaged in cross cultural dialogue. All of the above considered with reference to human creativity and its commitments and reflections on contemporary social and political issues (mainly issues involving violence). 

 

Aline M. Ramos earned her B.A. in Philosophy (2005) from the Pontifical Catholic University of Sao Paulo, Brazil (her home country).  She continued her studies at Fordham University (NY), where she earned her M.A. in Philosophy (2009) and went on to pursue an M.A. in Ethics and Society, currently in progress.  Her main research interests are: theories of intentionality, phenomenology and the philosophy of science.

 

Peter G Res received his Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy from Hartwick College in 2008. He is currently a Joel Oppenheimer Fellow in Poetry at New England College, where he is working toward his Master of Fine Arts. His work has been published in Dialogue, and is forthcoming in Arrested Development and Philosophy (Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series/Wiley Publishing). When he’s not publishing poetry, or writing letters, Res enjoys reading history books and dreaming of the end of disciplinary education.

 

Benjamin Rider is Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy and Religion at the University of Central Arkansas.  He received his PhD from the University of Texas at Austin.  His areas of specialization are Greek Philosophy and Ethics, and his philosophical interests include Classical Chinese Philosophy and Applied Ethics.  His recent work focuses on Plato's conceptions of philosophical education and self-knowledge.

 

Mark Sanders is currently a Lecturer at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, where he teaches Introduction to Philosophy, Social and Political Philosophy, American Philosophy and Liberal Studies classes, including Ethical Issues in Technology.  He is also co-advisor to the Philosophy Club and last year co-taught/coached the UNC Charlotte Ethics Bowl Team, which was draining and rewarding. This year his attention (and draining/rewarding prospects) will turn to being the local host for the 2010 SAAP Conference. This is his third time attending the SPCW Conference and he is a big fan!  His current work is an attempt to link deliberative democracy, pragmatic pluralism, and citizenship. Any help in this endeavor would be appreciated.

 

Mark Sentesy entered the doctoral program at Boston College after studying in the MA program at K. U. Leuven. His dissertation evaluates Aristotle’s extension of the analysis of motion to the account of being. He is also working in contemporary and ancient philosophy, especially on the nature of drives and language.

 

Joshua Simmonds is an alum of Hartwick College '08.  He's originally from the greater Boston area and is moving to New Haven, CT to work as an EMT and Computer Repair technician.  He's very interested in brewing his own beer and one day opening his own pub. He has served as a presenter at the First Annual Undergraduate Philosophy Conference at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.  He's also served as a discussant at numerous other undergraduate conference.  This is his first presentation at a non-Undergraduate setting.

 

Robert D. Stolorow, Ph.D., Ph.D. is a founding faculty member at the Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Los Angeles, and the Institute for the Psychoanalytic Study of Subjectivity, New York City. He is the author of Trauma and Human Existence: Autobiographical, Psychoanalytic, and Philosophical Reflections (Routledge, 2007) and coauthor of eight other books.

 

Levente Szentkirályi recently earned his Master's degree in Philosophy from the University of Connecticut, with concentrations in Social & Political Philosophy and Moral Theory.  He is currently teaching for Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth at Skidmore College in Saratoga Springs, NY.  While his principal ambition is to become a professor of Political Philosophy, Mr. Szentkirályi entertains a strong desire to pursue a career in public affairs, and a genuine interest in applying his formal studies to concrete social and political issues and examining public policy matters from a philosophical perspective. Accordingly, he is considering attending law school in the near future, to pursue a Juris Doctor degree with an emphasis in Environmental Law.

Some of the other professional conferences to which Mr. Szentkirályi has been invited to deliver papers of his include: the 2009 North American Society for Social Philosophy (NASSP) "International Social Philosophy Conference", the 2008 Institute for Humane Studies "Humane Studies Fellowship Research Colloquium", and the 2007 American Philosophical Association (APA) "Central Division Conference".

 

Ileana Szymanski got her Doctorate in Philosophy from the University of Guelph in Guelph, ON, Canada. Her dissertation was on Aristotle and sense-perception in *De Anima*. She was a lecturer at the University of New Brunswick (Fredericton, NB, Canada), and is currently Assistant Professor at the University of Scranton in Scranton, PA where she has been teaching Ancient Philosophy, Ethics, Introduction to Philosophy, and Feminist Philosophy of Science.

Her current research interests are philosophy of food, and the link between feminism, displacement, and identity. Among her current projects is a book chapter on feminism, hospitality and women in exile (currently under review).

 

George Teschner  is professor of philosophy at Christopher Newport University where he teaches courses in comparative philosophy, Asian philosophy, continental philosophy, philosophy of technology and philosophy of popular culture.  His published writings include topics in these

 

P. Eddy Wilson was born in Indiana, and he lived on the family farm
until he left for college at 18. His undergraduate and graduate
degrees were earned in Tennessee. In 1991 he began another
adventure by moving to North Carolina to join the faculty at Shaw
University
. He teaches philosophy, and since 2005 he has served as administrative Director for Shaw University CAPE in High Point.  His interests are in ethics, personalism, end of life issues, and philosophy of religion. He is an officer and teacher in a local church.

 

J. Jeremy Wisnewski is an obsessive-compulsive whose neurosis manifests itself in engaging in philosophical reflection (‘reflection’ is a generous description of Wisnewski’s near manic approach to philosophical questions). His symptoms include: gratuitous writing (he is the author of Wittgenstein and Ethical Inquiry (Continuum, 2007), The Politics of Agency (Ashgate, 2008), and The Ethics of Torture (with R.D. Emerick, Continuum, 2009)); excessive monological ruminations (he regularly teaches courses in moral philosophy, phenomenology, and ancient philosophy), delusions of grandeur (he consistently claims that his views are worthy of print); and compulsive organizational activity (you’re at this conference, aren’t you?). He hopes to avoid cure at all costs.

 

Abstracts

 

Basic Questions of Ethics and Moral Education

Stanley Konecky

Most human beings recognize other human beings as human beings same or very similar to themselves in nature.  Almost all are capable of distinguishing human beings from other animals and from machines.  Almost all regard their own human being as valuable.  Most regard some others, particularly family members and friends, and members of the same ethnic, cultural or organizational group, as valuable.  But, regularly and historically the same human beings, who recognize themselves as valuable, do not recognize all other humans as valuable.  And those who recognize humans are valuable often do not treat them as valuable.  Our concern is both to examine what makes human beings valuable and why humans do not consistently value humans.

 

Customs can’t be causal

Todd Jones

In this talk, I argue that customs cannot really cause behavior.   Terms like “customs” and the like seem to refer to a kind of (disjunctive) property that can’t really be causal.   And if there can be disjunctive properties, that only makes things worse for customs.  The social sciences would be better off without referring to properties like norms and customs as if they could be causal. 

 

Could New Terrorism Exist? A Philosophical Critique of the ‘Expert Analysis’

Liam Harte

In this paper, I aim to expose some logical flaws in the most widely-accepted and influential notion of the “new terrorist.” What I call the expert analysis of this concept consists of two putative necessary conditions: namely, the willingness to cause huge casualties (the destructiveness condition) in the service of limitless aims (the fanaticism condition). While many particular instantiations of the expert analysis include putative necessary conditions besides these, most include either or the destructiveness or the fanaticism condition, and usually both. I therefore treat the expert analysis as the core analysis of the concept; and so, if it is inadequate, then most particular analyses will be, too. Due to the impact of 9/11, the expert analysis is currently very influential in the academic, journalistic and policy establishments of the West, therein helping to determine understandings both of the threat of violent global terrorism and of the appropriate response to it.

I argue that the expert analysis cannot establish clear differences in kind between “new” and “old” terrorists, because the destructiveness and fanaticism conditions each mistake quantitative (and therefore accidental) features of “new terrorist” activities for qualitative (and, therefore the essential) ones. The destructiveness condition identifies only relatively greater destructiveness in the particular actions of particular terrorist organizations, and, as such, is really an empirical and not a conceptual distinction. Similarly, the fanaticism condition draws no clear distinction between the motivations of old and new terrorists other than the relative scales of the ends that they are trying to achieve. I conclude ultimately that acts of new terrorism, as defined by the expert analysis, can never occur because the incoherence of the analysis prevents it from describing any possible event or practice. Understandings of and responses to contemporary violent terrorism which are premised on this misconception are therefore misconceived.

 

Deliberative Democratic Citizenship

Mark Sanders

In this paper I propose an expansive and inclusive conception of citizenship based on the importance of deliberative democratic principles.  Taking the beliefs that human beings are political animals and the basis of political life is conflict, as a starting point, my aim is to help delineate a way for individuals to resolve conflicts and build democratic communities.  It is my contention that this is best achieved by understanding oneself as inextricably connected to others in a community, such that those with whom one has disagreements can be seen as members of some shared community.

 

Educating for Life: Liberal Arts and the Human Spirit

Peter Mehl

I argue that liberal arts education has bought into a scientistic attitude and therefore fails to engage issues of spiritual identity with students. If liberal arts education is going to flourish it must educate for meaning life. Critically reviewing two recent books on this topic, Anthony Kronman's Education's End: Why our Colleges and Universities have Given up on the Meaning of Life, and Mark Edmundson's Why Read?, I argue that they are largely correct in their effort to reconnect the liberal arts to matters of human meaning.  Epistemological issues and the role of religion in liberal arts education and society today are raised. How religion fits into education when it engages this spiritual quest is my final controversial consideration.

 

The Ethics of Superlongevity: Should We Cure Death?

Benjamin Rider

According to some scientists and futurists, it may soon be possible, as it were, to ‘cure’ death—to double or more average human life expectancy through technology.  This possibility is often called “superlongevity”.   I discuss two lines of argument against

superlongevityfirst, a utilitarian argument from Peter Singer, and then an argument of my own.  Neither argument is decisive (there are simply too many unknown variables), but they raise serious ethical questions about superlongevity that we need to consider as we reflect on the possibility of significantly expanding human life spans.

 

Gluttons for Sport

Jeffrey Fry

Gluttony has been considered a deadly sin or deadly vice.  In this paper I explore connections between gluttony and sport. I examine gluttony in sport, gluttony for sport, and gluttony as sport.  I draw on Gabriele Taylor and Martha Nussbaum in framing a remedy.  To be specific, I propose a normative conception of self-love in line with Nussbaum's "capabilities approach"  as a potential "healing virtue" (Taylor) for gluttony in relationship to sport.

 

Habits, Food, and Happiness

Ileana F. Szymanski

In this paper I will address the link between forming the habit of evaluating items as food/edible, and the habits that we form when evaluating options to achieving happiness as mutually reinforcing each other. I will take as a  a basis Aristotle’s theory of the acquisition of habits in his *Nicomachean Ethics*; then, I will draw a further, implicit conclusion from his theory, and claim that there is no obstacle to suppose that habits do reinforce each other. As a result, the habits that we form when evaluating items as food/edible can be mirrored in those that we form when evaluating sources of happiness. If this is the case, then the habit of voluntary restriction in evaluating items as food/edible (i.e. being a picky eater) could easily reinforce the restrictive habit that an individual may form when weighing her options for finding happiness. If this is the case then it is of great importance that we broaden our understanding of food in order to secure more openness in finding self-fulfillment.

 

Health Care Prioritization and Autonomy

Aaron Lercher

Suppose that a society has extended health insurance to all its members.  Suppose that the needed taxes and mandates are established.  Then the next question is:  What, morally and practically, should this insurance cover?  This is a way of posing the problem of prioritizing health care, or to use a loaded term, "rationing" of health care.  It is possible, surprisingly, to achieve strict prioritization without sacrificing the individuals' ability to make health care choices.  But this approach would impose excessive strains of commitment.  Instead, the basic moral problem of prioritization is how to live, and eventually to die, with our dependency, neediness, and weakness in a morally adequate way.  The two-stage prioritization process of the Oregon Health Care Plan for Medicaid indicates part of how to do this. 

 

Heidegger and Derrida on Eschatology

Joe Frank Jones, III

The goal of this essay is to show that Jacques Derrida’s messianic overlay on phenomenological deconstruction toward the end of his life could have had its origin in the work of Martin Heidegger.  This is not to say that deconstruction or deconstructive phenomenology is the same as Heidegger’s phenomenology, but to point out a weakness in Heidegger’s method which renders him unable to exclude or criticize any legitimately uncovered mode of Being within the horizon of the world into which Dasein is thrown.  Heidegger and Derrida were thrown into basically the same world horizon, despite being on very different sides of the German-Jewish problem in the mid-twentieth century.  Derrida, careful early on to focus on specific historical events, winds up toward the end of his career projecting specific historical problems into a theologized, messianic future.  Eschatological interpretations are certainly within the horizon of Western Dasein’s world.  Heidegger, I will show, does not have the tools to criticize these interpretations.  This seems a serious defect in a world of murderous monotheisms, each replete with its vision of the future.

 

Is it Natural or Unnatural to Follow the Golden Rule?

Caroline Meline

Lani Roberts’ challenge was to find one moral rule that would not go against “our animal natures.”  In response, I offer the Golden Rule, which is so widespread in human cultures that it may be said to embody a natural altruism.  The most basic question is whether altruism is a corrective overlay on top of human nature, an approach called “veneer theory” by the primatologist Frans de Waal (and what I take to be Lani’s position), or instead is a natural outgrowth of human evolution from nonhuman animals.  Another question is whether the Golden Rule exemplifies true altruism.  I conclude that whether or not altruism rests on egoistic needs and results in egoistic benefits, the fact that other-directed behavior occurs widely in the lives of humans and nonhumans is enough to show that the Golden Rule does not violate basic human nature.

 

Lockean Political Theory & Eminent Domain: An Allowance for Takings?

Levente Szentkiralyi

On 23 June 2005, the United States Supreme Court rendered a narrow majority decision in Susette Kelo v. City of New London, that economic development falls within the purview of ‘public use’ as specified by the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.   The ruling has subsequently generated much controversy, as it set a legal precedent that eminent domain can rightly be exercised to seize privately held properties and transfer them to private beneficiaries, when so doing might serve some public benefit.  The accenting Justices’ interpretation of the Takings Clause has been ardently criticized as forsaking the original meaning and intention of the article, and as misguidedly and imprudently lax—serving to enervate any rights to, and the entire notion of ownership in, private property.  Inspired by the disquieting implications of the Kelo decision, a recent working paper of mine launches an investigation to ascertain whether Lockean political theory—-which has commonly been understood as championing inalienable rights to private property—-may be friendly to such transfers of ownership.

 

The Luck of the Draw

P. Eddy Wilson

In this essay I address the problem of arbitrariness as it relates to the exercise of free will.  The libertarian who relies upon an event-causal account of free will must defend against the problem of arbitrariness or luck.  Once the luck problem is identified I suggest how the libertarian understands free choice within an indeterministic world.  I suggest how actors making free choices may be making experimental choices or character developing choices.  In addition, I address several objections raised by the hard incompatilist including the problem of parity and the problem of covariance.

 

Multicultural Education, Metaphysics and Alain Locke’s Post-Metaphysical Alternative

Christopher J. Collins

Should we understand education as, essentially, an epistemic process of discovery or, alternatively, as a generative process of self-creation?  How we approach this question will likely depend on implicit metaphysical assumptions about the nature of values.  How we answer it will likely determine the place of multiculturalism in education.  This paper first exposes the inadequacies of both traditionalist and non-traditionalist philosophical approaches to multiculturalism in education.  It then suggests an alternative approach based on the value theory of Classical American Pragmatist Alain Locke.  Locke’s functional approach to values avoids the problems of the alternative accounts while allowing multiculturalism a more central role in educational praxis.

 

Obama, Change, and Gender Equality

Howard Ponzer

In “Obama, Change, and Gender Equality,” I argue that Barack Obama, as the first African-American President of the US, can be viewed as an effective model for achieving equality, not just in the context of race, but also gender.  Against the backdrop of the tradition of identity politics and, specifically, Judith Butler’s Gender Trouble, I show that Obama’s actual lived experience as a political figure presents us with a human rights model of equality compatible with the interests, aspirations, and cultural diversity of the identity politics tradition.

 

Opening a Conversation between Secularism and Christianity in the United States

Karin Fry

Because of the divisiveness of the culture war, the Democratic Party has encouraged its candidates to stop discussing issues concerning separation of church and state in order to regain Christian voters.  Disturbingly, the rhetoric surrounding the culture war has led to the impression that one must choose between being religious and secular. This paper argues that historically, the idea of secularism in the United States does not contain a binary opposition between the atheistic and religious points of view and that a more inclusive notion of secularism could lead to a beneficial discussion between American citizens on the importance of having a secular state. Rather than allowing secularism to become a pejorative category by remaining silent, it is important to actively engage with the topic so that a more subtle and complicated understanding about the relationship between religion and the state could be achieved. 

 

Parts of the Word or Parts of the Machine? The Concept of Things in Greek and Modern Natural Philosophy

Mark Sentesy

The problems confronting science change depending on how its practitioners conceive of the parts of things. In this paper I compare two ways of thinking about parts: the Ancient Greek conception of elements as letters, and the Modern conception of things as machines.

The discovery of the elements in Greek Philosophy is a revolution in the conception of parts and wholes and therefore of science, so the first part of this paper works discusses the way that Plato uses written words as models for the way parts fit together into whole things. The first recognizably scientific accounts of things were accomplished by drawing an analogy between writing and things: the word for ‘element’ is the word for ‘letter.’

The second part of this paper works out how the machine changes the concept of a nature and its parts. Early Modern science is recognizable through a new metaphor for the workings of nature: the machine and its correlative concepts of force, cause and effect. This conception of the cosmos required a re-evaluation of what it was to be human, engendering the paradox of consciousness as the “ghost in the machine,” and the opposition between nature and freedom or spirit that, as Schelling wrote, remained unresolved at the close of the modern era.

The paper closes with a sketch of our current model of the physical world—energy—and discusses possible implications of this conception of things.

 

The Phenomenology of Alexithymia as a Clue to the Intentionality of Emotion

Ralph D. Ellis

This paper explores the paradoxical phenomenon of alexithymia – the inability to feel one’s own emotions – as a way of getting at the connection between valuation and emotion. Alexithymics are unable to understand the motivating reasons for their own actions because the qualitative, valuational dimension of their consciousness remains largely hidden to them. I propose that alexithymics may be deficient either in the ability to pay attention to their own bodily sensations, or deficient in access to the action imagery that normally would give us a qualitative, subjective sense of what we are motivated to do, grounded in the corresponding action imagery. This dual nature of alexithymia shows that the valuational intentionality of emotions – our sense of their qualitative feel as well as their aims, objects and intentional meanings, are not grounded only in an association between perception of body states and perceptual imagery (as Damasio has suggested), but that knowing what I feel – and what I value – is also a matter of forming a felt sense grounded in the actions that I want to perform. This also highlights the “alexithymia of everyday life,” since emotional feelings by their very nature are murky and difficult to nail to clear aims, objects, and values.

 

The Place of Home

Janet Donohoe

In this paper I address the normative power of place, specifically the place of home, or, as Edmund Husserl would call it, the homeworld.  I explore this Husserlian notion of homeworld and its counterpoint, alienworld, to address the reasons why place would have a normative power and to what extent that normativity can be drawn into question through encounters with alienworld.  I also think through the ramifications of this priority of the homeworld for “displaced” peoples questioning whether an alien place can ever take on the normative and identity power of home place.  Finally, I investigate whether the place of the homeworld has significantly changed due to the time-space compression of the contemporary world.

 

A Platonic Challenge to Homeric Justice and Machiavellian Political Assumptions: A Socratic Therapy for Contemporary Times

Edward J. Grippe

This paper will consider Plato’s response to Thrasymachus’ notion of justice in Book 1 of the Republic, and by extension the Platonic challenge to Machiavellian justice in The Prince. The theme of Homeric Justice (i.e., helping friends and harming enemies) will be used to unify the analysis and to draw out the implications inherent in each position. I will contend that, despite the opinion common in contemporary minds that while the Socratic therapeutic of helping friends and counseling alleged enemies would be ideal practical “real world” consideration makes the Socratic ideal seem impractical and naive, the Thrasymachus/Maciavellian egoistic version of justice of harming enemies for the sake of self-preservation and political advantage is intrinsically isolating, unnecessarily divisive, and ultimately self-defeating personally, domestically and internationally.

 

Portkeys, Resurrective Ideology, and the Phenomenology of Collective Trauma

Robert D. Stolorow

In this essay, I extend my conception of emotional trauma as a shattering of the tranquilizing “absolutisms of everyday life” that shield us from our finitude and our existential vulnerability, to a consideration of collective trauma. Using the collective trauma of 9/11 and its aftermath as my prime example, I illustrate how traumatized people fall prey to “resurrective ideologies” that promise to restore the sheltering illusions that have been lost. I suggest that an alternative to these grandiose illusions can be found in our “kinship-in-finitude.”

 

Racism and Sexism as Tools in Torture’s Defense: A Cautionary Note

J. Jeremy Wisnewski

The literature surrounding torture has ballooned in recent years, propelled by the ‘ticking-bomb’ argument. In this paper, I explore some of the reasons we should be skeptical of this argument. The reasons I offer are not the usual ones. Rather, my concern is that our thinking through this case is informed by hidden assumptions about race and gender that display the worst kinds of prejudicial thinking. Moreover, the very structure of the ticking-bomb case suggests that, in the end, it isn’t even a thought-experiment about torture at all.

 

Recovering the Satellite: Heidegger and Technology

Joshua Simmonds

The aim of my work was to explore the connections between two of Heidegger's most important works: "Being and Time" and "The Question Concerning Technology", namely how Authenticity fits in with Modern Technology.  Through careful analysis, and with an elimination of as much bias as possible, I propose that the barrier technology poses in Heidegger's world is not quite so dire as he makes it out to be.  Technology, inevitably, becomes simply one more obstacle we must reappropriate in our anticipatory resoluteness.

 

A Retrieval of Authentic Care: An Exploratory Analysis of Being-With in Heidegger and Aristotle

Peter G Res

This paper explores Heidegger’s concept of authentically being-with as it is grounded in his notion of solicitude, which is crucial to the phenomenon of care in Being and Time. Rather than to provide a negative, or half-hearted analysis of this seemingly impossible aspect of Authenticity, my general grounding seeks out the actual, as a means for practical insight into Heidegger’s thought. Beginning with an intuitive response to the prima facie difficulties of positing Authenticity among average understanding, I draw out a nuanced approach to Heidegger’s notion of “silence” in Conscience, where the possibilities for discursive understanding and questioning are not bound by statements of mere assertion. “Silence” is thereby illuminated as unique in both its actuality and its force.

In foregrounding my discussion of being-with, I evoke Aristotle’s notion of “practical wisdom” as an excellent form of moral perception, which cannot be subsumed into other forms of knowledge. Heidegger’s own moment of vision will be explored as a correlate. In turning back to Heidegger from Aristotle, I return to the concept of solicitude as it is discussed in Being and Time.  Heidegger’s understanding of practical wisdom in The Sophist, as signifying “unforgettable conscience” and “conscience set into motion” is discussed as well, for a greater understanding of the pragmatic importance of both Heidegger’s phenomenon of conscience, and Aristotle’s notion of practical wisdom as lived concepts.

Lastly, Aristotle’s understanding of Friendship, as necessary for practical wisdom, will reveal a ‘calling forth to praxis’ that will hopefully ‘free’ authentically being-with from further philosophical misunderstanding, and perhaps, to greater possibilities of actuality.

 

 Revolutionary Islam: A Self-Cultivating Identity through Education

Aisha Raees

In this paper I want to locate a place for pragmatism as a model of learning through cultivating growth as an ideal norm within a traditional society. I will take Pakistan as an example of such a society and Islam as the “live,” historical doctrine that is to be reinterpreted. By doing this I wish to see whether a revolutionary Islam embracing Cornel West’s idea of prophesy is a serious possibility for the area. I see education as a means of cultivating an identity and that this creates a way out of the violent onset of dogma that settles in when this cultivation is not the focus of inquiry. Finally, I make the case for such an identity as inextricable to the creative answers a culture provides to its very peculiar shortcomings.

 

Saussure and the Metalinguistics of Ancient Taoism
George Teschner

Saussure, in an oracular and prophetic manner, asserts in the Course in General Linguistic that, "No one disputes the arbitrary nature of the sign, but it is often easier to discover a truth than to assign to it its proper place. Principle 1 [The bond between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary.] dominates all the linguistics of language; its consequences are numberless." Among these consequences are important ontological and linguistic implications that have informed such claims in 20th century Continental Philosophy as Derrida's assertion that no act of signification transcends language, and Foucault's identification of truth and power. Saussure's principle of the arbitrary nature of the sign is also consistent with the emphasis on the performative nature of language in thinkers like Austin and Wittgenstein.  In the Taoism of ancient China, and in particular the writings of Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu, is found a repudiation of a representational theory of language based on the arbitrary nature of the sign.  The paper examines, in ancient Chinese thought, such notions as the distinction between count nouns, mass nouns, and abstract nouns; the rectification of names; mind and mental states; reference and intentionality; and the distinction between knowing how and knowing that, in order to clarify and explore some of consequences that Saussure claims follows from the arbitrary nature of the sign.  

 

Science as a Human Endeavor: On the Odd Bifurcation of Science and the Humanities

Donald Poochigian

The challenged significance of the humanities in contrast to the unchallenged significance of science descends from Logical Positivism which arose subsequent to the First World War. Reality is assumed to be what is observable. Science identifies objects and relations; humanities identify relations. Scientific objects and relations are observable; humanistic relations are unobservable. Scientific relations are numeric; humanistic relations are qualitative. Number is observable; quality is unobservable.

Science being a human social activity, though, an understanding of it is incomplete without an understanding of the human implementing it provided by the humanities. As a social activity, testimonial knowledge determines truth or falsity of scientific conclusions. Observation is determinate of science, when observation is intersubjectively unobservable. Only by testimony is observation knowable. Literature being a fundamental means of evaluating testimonial knowledge, it is essential to science.

History and philosophy determine science’s ontological content. Dependent on accidental participant values, there is no necessity in consensuses in different circumstances being consistent, inconsistencies accumulating. Science being incomplete, history and philosophy bring coherence to it by containing science within an encompassing domain. History contains it within an evolutionary domain, and philosophy contains it within an emergent domain. Thus, the humanities condition the content of science epistemologically and ontologically.

 

Scientific revolutions and the crisis of science: an examination of historicity and its role for the scientific community according to Thomas Kuhn and Edmund Husserl.

Aline M. Ramos

One of the greatest problems in the philosophy of science is how we can find a valid method of inquiry for it, i.e. if it is possible to begin an inquiry into the nature of science if we do not know what it is.  If we lack that ontological basis, how can we even talk about the aims and progresses of science?

The aim of this paper is to show what the roles of the philosopher and historicity are in the philosophy of science, particularly in providing it with the elements which allow for its unification and progress.  My approach is to start with Thomas Kuhn’s view of science and scientific progress and suggest how it could be made more robust with the aid of Edmund Husserl’s philosophy of science. 

 

Toleration in a global world from a liberal perspective

Herzl Baruch

 Should the intolerant have the right to be tolerated? Bearing on Nazism as a movement and regime, Popper's answer is no. Unlike Classical liberal philosophers, such as Locke, Voltaire and Mill, who regarded toleration as a major principle to advance liberal society, Popper's concern is how to restrict it in order "to defend tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant" (Popper, 1945, 265). Moreover, they didn't regard being intolerant, or having intolerant beliefs, a (good) reason to limit the scope of toleration. Challenging the intolerant as a serious problem Popper worries that in contemporary liberal society many good-hearted (morally) and naïve (epistemologically) liberals are unaware of the "unpleasant condition" that endangers their society and irresponsibly they are too far attached to toleration because they fear to be intolerant (Popper, 1987, 17-18; 1994, 191-192). I argue that the answer to question of tolerating the intolerant shouldn't rely only on the Nazi and alike movement and regimes (the Apartheid regime in South Africa), but should take into account the Ghandian and similar tolerant movements (Luther King and Lord Fitt) as well. While it is clear that the first shouldn't be tolerated, Ghandi has proved that there are those intolerant that should be tried to be tolerated because they could become more tolerant. It is suggested that in order to prevent the deterioration of the tolerant into intolerance and foster the advancement of the intolerant into tolerance, it is of out most importance to begin with the presumption that the intolerant should be tried to be tolerated.

 

The Uses and Abuses of Reproductive Technologies: Charting a Feminist Response to the Future of Reproductive Technology

Wendy Lee

A recent story from an Associated Press news item, “Pregnancy Outsourced to India: Infertile Couples Look Overseas for Surrogacy”: Anand, India—Every night in this quiet western India city, 15 pregnant women prepare for sleep in their spacious house they share, ascending the stairs in a procession of ballooned bellies, to bedrooms that become a landscape of soft hills. A team of maids, cooks, and doctors look after the women whose pregnancies would be unusual anywhere else but are common here. The young mothers of Annand, a place famous for its milk, are pregnant with the children of infertile couples from around the world. The small clinic at Kaival Hospital matches infertile couples with local women, cares for the women during pregnancy and delivery, and counsels them afterward. Anand’s surrogate mothers, pioneers in the field of outsourced pregnancies, have given birth to roughly 40 babies. (Press Enterprise, hereafter PE, 1.3. 2008, p. 5). It’s tempting to read the article—complete with photograph of the smiling fertility clinic coordinator, the happy couple, and their cheery-looking newborn as a kind of “everyone wins” story of what IVF can make possible. Indeed, the description of “spacious houses,” “bedrooms that become landscapes of soft hills,” and the depiction of surrogate mothers as “pioneers” elicits an image of a kind of resort for these surrogate “mothers.” As we read further, however, a number of questions begin to take shape. Ought, for instance, corporations whose locus of production involves women’s reproductive capacities be understood in the same way as other corporations with respect to their moral responsibilities to their workers? Are surrogates workers like other workers—despite the fact that the site of production is the womb? What about the consumers of IVF-facilitated reproductive services? What are they buying? A service? If so, whose? The surrogate’s? The agency’s? To whom, in other words, are the consumer-“parents” responsible? Are they buying a baby or adopting one? Can the latter make any sense when the baby is the couple’s genetic offspring? Is the baby a product? Does the global nature of the transaction or the portability of the technology alter the use of IVF in any important way? Should we think of reproductive technologies in the same way we think of other technologies, for example, the robotics of automotive manufacture or the cash register at the grocery outlet? Where does the outsourcing of surrogacy fit into the globalized “free” market? Perhaps the most important question, however is: why are couples from wealthy countries like the United States or Great Britain contracting with agencies from developing countries like India to secure a surrogate to make babies?